Separation of Powers by Geoff Metcalf

The Family Security Foundation, Inc. ^ | April 5, 2007 | Geoff Metcalf

[K-oneTexas]

Exclusive: Separation of Powers
Geoff Metcalf
Author: Geoff Metcalf
Source: The Family Security Foundation, Inc.
Date: April 5, 2007

Nearly a century ago, Teddy Roosevelt said, “It is not the critic who counts, not the one who points out how the strong man stumbled.” FSM Contributing Editor Geoff Metcalf brilliantly uses an interesting historical perspective to demonstrate the malfeasance and diffidence of current congressional representatives in doing their prescribed jobs. Will this Congress continue to hog-tie the president, imperiling our troops and endangering the country? Read what Geoff concludes.

 

Separation of Powers

 

By Geoff Metcalf

 

“Courage overrides self-doubt, but does not end it.”

--Mason Cooley

 

The three branches of government (Executive, Legislative and Judicial) are co-equal. Each branch has specific duties and responsibilities which, at various times throughout history, various individuals have seemed intent on ignoring.  House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is the most recent and flagrant example of presumptive abuse of power, but she by no means is the ‘Lone Ranger’.

History, inertia and malfeasance have altered the government that brilliance and serendipity provided us with as the republic.

Various presidents (Lincoln, Wilson, FDR, Kennedy, LBJ, Nixon, Clinton and Bush the elder and W) have presumed to assume more power and authority than ever intended.

Members of Congress have contributed to the overreach of the executive largely through malfeasance and diffidence in doing their prescribed jobs.

The judiciary (perhaps recognizing the testosterone deficiency of Congress) has presumed not just to “judge” but to legislate from the bench.

Congress has the authority (and responsibility) to declare war. However, the gutless wonders have not done so since Pearl Harbor despite having granted various presidents the authority to dispatch military adventures all over the globe over 150 times since World War II.

Much of the grandstanding and petty partisan sniping could and should be eliminated if government just did the jobs they have.  Presidents should not make laws and Congress should not meddle in foreign policy.

It has always seemed odd that Congress has eschewed their congressional responsibilities concerning declaring wars. Declarations of war carry responsibilities for which Congress after Congress has demonstrated a lack of interest or courage in this regard.  Oh, they will grant a president the “authority” to make the tough call, but always cling to sufficient “plausible deniability” to cry for “do-overs” if or when things turn sour.  Frankly, once they have proved malfeasant in their responsibility, they give up their right to righteous indignation and do-overs.

I am again reminded of Teddy Roosevelt’s words in Paris, “It is not the critic who counts, not the one who points out how the strong man stumbled or how the doer of deeds might have done better.”  The war critics are the ones picking at scabs and ripping the strong man as he stumbles.

 

Roosevelt observed, “The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred with sweat and dust and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy cause;”

 

That always reminds me of Dr. Robert Jarvick, inventor of the artificial heart, who said, “Leaders are visionaries, with a poorly developed sense of fear, and no concept of the odds against them…they make things happen.”

 

In other words, risk takers don’t always score. Babe Ruth held home run records AND strike out records.  If you swing big, you miss big.  Mel Gibson had a great line in ‘The Patriot’ when he was counseling his adolescent son before an ambush of British troops: “Aim small…miss small…” The corollary is also true.

 

When Roosevelt extolled the virtues of the doer of deeds, he said, “who, if he wins, know the triumph of high achievement; and who, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory or defeat.”

 

The growing gaggle of political wimps who yearn for the taste of victory without the risks and danger of making hard decisions are “cold and timid souls.”

 

I vividly recall a crusty old Army Master Sergeant at Fort Benning during a leadership reaction test telling us “…make a decision. If it is wrong, fix it. Better to fix a wrong decision than to stand around with your head in rectal defilade over analyzing everything and taking fire.”

 

Leaders lead. Usually, they are not remembered for their serial failures, but rather for their significant successes which would never happen if they were “cold and timid souls.”

 

Once upon a time 56 extraordinary men pledged to each other their lives, fortunes and sacred honor. At the time the framers intended for the Constitution to serve as a bridging mechanism to fix some of the errors in the Articles of the Confederacy and to quiet some interstate commercial hassles. They got lucky, and we have been the beneficiaries of their courage, insights and luck.

 

House Speaker Pelosi is leading a congressional delegation on a fact-finding tour of the Middle East. Bullfeathers!  She said she would speak to the Syrians about Iraq, their role in the fight against terrorism, their support for militant groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas — that’s not her job.  Her job is in Congress, not providing photo opportunities and mixed messages on U.S. foreign policy.

 

FamilySecurityMatters.org Geoff Metcalf is an author and former nationally syndicated and major market radio talk show host. His background covers a wide spectrum of radio, television, magazine, and newspapers. A former Green Beret and retired Army officer, he is the author of ‘The Terrorist Killers’ (a novel) and ‘In The Arena’ (a collection of interviews). Visit Geoff's Web Site: www.geoffmetcalf.com. E-mail: geoff@geoffmetcalf.com

x

© 2003-2007 FamilySecurityMatters.org All Rights Reserved

[K-oneTexas]

Excellent, well written article, throughly enjoyable. On point with our government today.

[Old Sarge]

I vividly recall a crusty old Army Master Sergeant at Fort Benning during a leadership reaction test telling us “…make a decision. If it is wrong, fix it. Better to fix a wrong decision than to stand around with your head in rectal defilade over analyzing everything and taking fire.”

Yepper, that's an NCO for ya!!

[Alia]

From article: “It is not the critic who counts, not the one who points out how the strong man stumbled or how the doer of deeds might have done better.” The war critics are the ones picking at scabs and ripping the strong man as he stumbles.

Exactly, Geoff. Former SecDef Rumsfeld said something very true, too: "You go with the Army you've got."

True about war, our President, this time and day: You go with the Army you've got. 2006 elections showed, instead, how many who "understand" Former SecDef's adage showed themselves, instead: "picking at scabs and ripping the strong man as he stumbles."

IOW, the quarterback was sprinting towards the field goal, and line defense was weak, squabbling and complaining that they had the rougher assignment, the plan was not good, or complaining they'd do their jobs better but only if they had a quarterback they "liked" or who fit their definition of "quarterback".