Here's another blast by Zeifman, who knew Hillary during Watergate: Democratic Party "Leper" Endorses Bush
[Zeifman threatened to resign as House Judiciary Counsel if Hillary weren't disciplined for her attempts to deprive Nixon of counsel.]
Posted on 04/06/2007 2:18:11 PM PDT by jazusamo
and the whole of the GOP should INSIST on it but...they won’t. They’ll wimp out. Just like they always do.
Those are big liberal papers and it is significant that they are criticizing her trip. Tip O’Neill wouldn’t have done it.
Actually, all GWB has to do is refer any interest raised by Pelosi’s negotiations straight back to Pelosi. Since she’s powerless to control foreign policy, she’ll then have the pleasant task of explaining to whoever took her seriously that she was only BSing.
Absolutely! She undermined the Prez and the State Department with NO authority. W even told her not to go.
A Logan Act violation at best, treason at worst.
There is a one word explanation
for Pelosi’s behavior.....Power.
A cheap stunt designed not be
constructive but simply to
advance the Dems and herself.
For her, Love of Country takes
a back seat to desire of Power.
Look at the good she can do in the next year or so ... naive and stupid, it’s a powerful combination. Lots of potential.
At LEAST the GOP should demand an investigation/special prosecutor. BTW, if Pelosi did resign, who would be Speaker? Hoyer?
She looks like a bag lady in that pic.All she needs now is a shopping cart and a bottle of Night Train.
Really, what would it take to get MSM
to betray Pelosi?
-Pelosi hamming it up on Anti-Aircraft
gun in Syria.
-Pelosi Photo-op with Osama bin Laden.
-Pelosi wrapping herself in an Iranian Flag.
What?
Who the hell is running our foreign policy now?
Pelosi or Bush?
Our Allies, namely Israel, are getting confused.
I ask again, who the hell is running our foreign policy?
Clearly, We do not know at this time, and we wont unless Pelosi gets indicted for crossing over that bright line.
Some one in the White House better get some balls and nail this woman. This is disgusting.
Don’t know who would replace her. Yes, you are right ... the GOP should open an investigatiion and give her and her party all the grief they have given others but...like I said...”they won’t.” As long as there is no backbone...the dem/libs will get away with anything they want.
Here's another blast by Zeifman, who knew Hillary during Watergate: Democratic Party "Leper" Endorses Bush
[Zeifman threatened to resign as House Judiciary Counsel if Hillary weren't disciplined for her attempts to deprive Nixon of counsel.]
Thanks for that link, Phil. That is a great article and very informative. Zeifman is not afraid to say what he thinks. lol
but...but...but...she was only carrying messages for Pres. Bush and the Israelis. We’re supposed to ignore the fact that Pres. Bush said, “Don’t go.” The Israelis say she’s not carrying any message for them, but what would they know?
ping
**Nancy Pelosi has persistently violated her duty to exercise her speaker powers in accordance with the Constitution and the current “106th Congress House Rules Manual” (House Document 106-320).
In short, she has fostered what is known as “tyranny by the majority” — and violated House Rules that give her the duty to maintain order, civility, and decorum, and to foster “comity” (a word rarely used these days, meaning “mutual respect”).**
Agree. She was a disgrace to her office.
Hmmm....
At whose bidding, I wonder....
This feckless woman screwup isn't good news for missus clinton, (a feckless (woman?) screwup in her own right)....
|
I don't remember if he had anything about Fred Thompson in the book.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.
hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her 
president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of 