Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
I’m thinking that those people who are not putting national security first but instead focusing exclusively on social issues should be called liberals.

I'm conservative across the board. I've been all over Bush and the Republicans for spending money and expanding government.

And, and because I am, I oppose a liberal like Giuliani, who is only conservative on TWO issues while radically liberal on virtually every other.

It's disgraceful any conservative could have such little principles as support a candidate that is 80%-plus liberal. And, even more disgraceful knowing how such a nominee would tear apart the Republican and conservative base.

66 posted on 04/06/2007 5:09:15 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky
It's disgraceful any conservative could have such little principles as support a candidate that is 80%-plus liberal. And, even more disgraceful knowing how such a nominee would tear apart the Republican and conservative base.

80% liberal? You know what's disgraceful? That you know so little about Rudy that you think he's 80% liberal. He's a social liberal but he's a fiscal and law and order conservative.

69 posted on 04/06/2007 5:40:37 PM PDT by Peach (Mercy Me. Not banned yet. Too bad. So sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson