To: Clint N. Suhks
I’m not advocating that Roe not be overturned. I’m talking about what would happen, as a practical matter, if Roe is overturned.
That’s not specious in any way. And many pro lifers I know have a poor grasp of a potential post-Roe political landscape.
149 posted on
04/07/2007 9:55:08 AM PDT by
HitmanLV
("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do suck seed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
To: HitmanLV
Roe was based on Griswald, a bad law that sacked the 10th amendment. Only those who believe the Constitution is a “living” document care what law is based on Roe.
Plenty of law was based on Plessy, so the argument that “some” law built on president can’t be overturned certainly is specious.
152 posted on
04/07/2007 10:15:32 AM PDT by
Clint N. Suhks
( Was crucified, died, and was buried. He descended into hell. On the third day He rose again.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson