How so? He is pro-choice, not anti-constitution. As an ex-prosecutor he wants judges who can defend the strict meaning of the Constitution. That means, judges must interpret that constitution as it was originally intended and not making up law as they go along.
Has it occurred to you that politicians LIE to get elected?
LOL!! If Rudy wanted to lie to get elected, why didn't he just lie and say something like... “I was pro-choice before but I had a change of heart just like Ronald Reagan did, or both President Bushes did, before they became President. I'm no longer pro-choice but pro-life, and I will nominate orginalists judges to the court."
See, that's lying. Rudy didn't do that. So if Rudy says he is pro-choice and you and everyone believes him, why do you think he is lying when he said he would appoint originalist judges to the bench?
You can't accuse him of lying and believe him only what suits you.
Another thing that folks fail to grasp is that a person may personally be for legal abortion and also think the issue is best left up top the states and that Roe should be overturned. That goes for politicians and judges.
In the meanwhile, you can believe that Roe is valid law of the land, which by the way it is whether we like it or not.
Good point. The anti-Rudy folks try to have it both ways. Not a very good "strategy." lol