Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zook
I’m all in favor of government funding in cases of rape or incest or to save a mother’s life. I hope that’s what Rudy meant.

...to save a mother's life? You still buy that argument? Most of the time a baby can be saved, by a C Section, NOT abortion... and I know I will probably lose some that even anti abortionst's on this one.... a baby that is conceived even by rape or incest, can be adopted out. Why should they be killed?

120 posted on 04/06/2007 2:59:11 PM PDT by pollywog (Joshua 1:9 Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: pollywog

Pollywog—I’m speaking from experience. My aunt went into labor on Christmas Eve, 1962. Something went wrong. They could have saved her life at the cost of her baby. She chose to die rather than allow her baby to die.

Not every woman should have to do the same. If there’s any risk at all that a mother might die because of bearing a child, then she ought not be forced to bear it.

In cases like this I would leave the decision up to a woman and her doctor, and those who can’t afford needed treatment should get it at no cost.


123 posted on 04/06/2007 5:15:16 PM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: pollywog

...and regarding rape or incest, I maintain that a girl or woman in either circumstance has the right to refuse to carry that potential child to term.


124 posted on 04/06/2007 5:17:05 PM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson