Eh. Your scare tactics leave me unimpressed. Not only do they not work on me, they're ineffective for the cause. If you want me to vote for Guiliani, don't put on a Hillary mask and go "Booga Booga." Rather, explain to me how a vote for Guiliani is a vote toward restoration of constitutional government.
Because that's what wins my vote.
Excuse me, you were the one claiming this thread presented a false dichotomy.
I responded to your post with a reasoned and detailed analysis.
And guess what? You suddenly seemed to find the discussion of the fine art of logic irrelevant, and instead began the usual jaw-flapping and foot-stamping and wails about “scare tactics,” as if making the observation-—as I did-—that your response did not demonstrate the application of logic was “scary.”
And then there’s the other last recourse of the cornered: claiming that “I” want you to vote for Giluiani and “I” can’t make you.
Uh . . . DUH. And I never said anything about voting for Giuliani. I said take the quiz and make up your own mind.
Thus far, you have refused to do that. Instead, you ask me to “explain to [you] how a vote for Giuliani is a vote toward restoration of constitutional government.”
“Restoration of constitutional government”? Wow, you’re out there.
Anyway.
Why don’t you take the quiz and explain to me how a vote that effectively elects the Rat party to power is a vote “toward restoration of constitutional government”?