Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wouldntbprudent

What it boils down to is that by refusing to vote for a liberal Republican such as Rudy, and making that position known well in advance of the primaries, conservatives will be no more responsible for Hillary (or some other Democrat)being elected than would those who voted for the liberal Republican candidate in the primary knowing full well that the liberal would not be capable of winning in the general election.

If you are truly concerned about keeping Hillary out of the White House, then you need to get behind a candidate that can carry the conservative vote, and that won’t be Rudy.


191 posted on 04/11/2007 8:16:24 AM PDT by deaconjim (Because He lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: deaconjim

I can’t agree with that kind of gamesmanship, or that by supposedly telling others how you will react to “their” actions, you absolve youself of responsibility for your actions.

For one thing, no one individual can control the outcome of the primaries. It is not appropriate to treat others as though they can.

Besides, isn’t the bottom line what is best for the country? Isn’t that, not “I told you so,” what one should be thinking about on Election Day?

Do *you* want to keep the Rat party from political power in this country? Then *you* need to vote against it, if that’s what it takes. That’s pretty much all there is to it.


192 posted on 04/11/2007 10:12:29 AM PDT by wouldntbprudent (HONK IF YOU'VE SACKED TROY SMITH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson