Skip to comments.
Giuliani to social conservatives: Take it or leave it
CNN ^
| April 05, 2007
Posted on 04/05/2007 11:53:32 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Rudy Giuliani's message to social conservatives: If you don't like my views, don't vote for me.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2ndamendment; abortiani; abortion; acnnagenda; babykiller; buhbye; cnnhitpiece; crossdressiani; duncanhunter; electionpresident; elections; forkdone; giuliani; goodbyrudy; gungrabiani; infanticide; julieannie; liberalkornreich; naral; norudys; rudy; rudyrino; rudyscroopooch; rudytherino; sickofrudy; takeyourguns; verysickofrudy; veryverysickofrudy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940, 941-960, 961-980, 981-995 next last
To: Howlin
"Sissy boys." So now you trot insults out for me, huh? Sorry, I've been inoculated.
God Bless.
941
posted on
04/06/2007 11:03:30 AM PDT
by
Enosh
(†)
To: Enosh
You’re a gentleman, Enosh. :)
942
posted on
04/06/2007 11:15:57 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: econjack
“Regardless of which side of the issue you’re on, he has the guts to state his position even though it will cost him votes. I find that pretty refreshing”
Yes! He is refreshingly honest in his view that killing 50,000,000 babies is a wonderful thing to celebrate! and to keep on doing! What a heart that man has!!! America! rejoice!!
943
posted on
04/06/2007 11:18:17 AM PDT
by
upsdriver
((Hunter / Thompson......Gonzo politics)
To: raybbr
Delusionaler. It defines the rudy-bots to a tee. LOL----sure does.
944
posted on
04/06/2007 11:27:52 AM PDT
by
Liz
(Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
To: PRND21
This "liberal" turned out ok.At least you're finally out of denial.
945
posted on
04/06/2007 11:39:53 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
To: jmc813
Nice twisting of words. That’s why I don’t normally answer you. You’re dishonest.
946
posted on
04/06/2007 11:42:38 AM PDT
by
PRND21
To: Corin Stormhands
I don’t care what you say Stormfront...
To: PRND21
Nice twisting of words. Thats why I dont normally answer you. Youre dishonest.In all honesty, I didn't see that picture of Reagan until I viewed your latest posts. It didn't show up on the thread for whatever reason. I thought you were referring to yourself as a former liberal and I was trying to be a wiseass.
948
posted on
04/06/2007 11:53:29 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
To: ecurbh
Well, not king of Gondor, but he did inherit the throne of Rohan. Which would be like... a governorship, perhaps?That would depend on what side of the charge you were on when the riders of Rohan attacked, wouldn't it?
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
I dont care what you say Stormfront... Ah well, good to see that you're at least as illiterate this month as you were last.
Carry on then.
To: jmc813
Fair enough. Enjoy Easter.
951
posted on
04/06/2007 1:07:09 PM PDT
by
PRND21
To: PRND21
Fair enough. Enjoy Easter.Thanks, yo. Yourself as well.
952
posted on
04/06/2007 1:13:54 PM PDT
by
jmc813
(The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
To: PRND21; Liz
Nope, that was pure anti-Republican FR Kookiness. You're soaking in it.Oh, oh. Now you've done it. You called Liz an anti-Republican.
I would bet, that like me, she doesn't consider being called anti-republican a slur anymore. I bet she would rather be called a conservative - like I do.
Republicans, as a national party, are no longer conservatives. And, those that blindly follow the national republican party are just as easily led as the lemming-like democrats.
953
posted on
04/06/2007 1:46:42 PM PDT
by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
To: raybbr
Republicans, as a national party, are no longer conservatives.Lots of Conservatives however, are Republicans.
Which is why the 1 percenters will lose again...Patsies/Keysters/?
954
posted on
04/06/2007 1:56:03 PM PDT
by
PRND21
To: raybbr; PRND21
Course, I could post what the odiferous Rudybots are soaking in———but I don’t use such language.
955
posted on
04/06/2007 2:02:36 PM PDT
by
Liz
(Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
To: Liz
Course, I could post what the odiferous Rudybots are soaking in———but I don’t use such language.Correct, you use paranoid delusional extremist language. And this site suffers for it.
956
posted on
04/06/2007 2:06:35 PM PDT
by
PRND21
To: EternalVigilance
Come on Fred Thompson, announce already.
To: PRND21; raybbr
You don’t say.....
My, my, that’s some diagnosis, except that impersonating a doctor is serious business.
Besides, if you dont’t like what you read here, you know where you can go.
958
posted on
04/06/2007 2:16:42 PM PDT
by
Liz
(Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
To: Liz
Hysterics is your right. Carry on,
Extremist.
959
posted on
04/06/2007 2:26:45 PM PDT
by
PRND21
To: Liz; PRND21
Awww, c'mon Liz. Don't be extremist! Be a lemming like, well, you know.....
960
posted on
04/06/2007 2:30:20 PM PDT
by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940, 941-960, 961-980, 981-995 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson