Posted on 04/04/2007 10:25:19 PM PDT by debbieargel
This hits home folks. We can no longer call this the Global War on Terror? To make a long story short...my son, Capt. Derek Argel and others, were fighting the Global War on Terror in THIS country long before we went to Iraq. Who of a right mind does not understand that we are fighting this war in the cells of America? What does it take? Why do the Dems insist on isolating the war in Iraq from the rest of the threat? Somebody help me please! Who appointed Nancy Palosi as President while I was asleep? Deb Argel Bastain Proud mother of Capt. Derek Argel, 23rd STS USAF Combat Control, KIA Memorial Day, 2005 Diyala Iraq In Service to God and Country
What madness walks amongst us?
The lines that separate us as a nation and as peoples couldn’t be any clearer after this weeks events and the week isn’t over yet.
Bless you , Debbie and your family.
“Who appointed Nancy Palosi as President while I was asleep?”
Those republicans who stayed at home during the elections because they felt betrayed by the republicans. Now they know what it is like to be betrayed by the democrats. It is as simple as that. As obnoxious as it may be, the American electorate must learn to vote for the lesser of two evils.
Bump!
I made my call awhile back, Debbie.
“Who appointed Nancy Palosi as President while I was asleep?”
Well, I’m sorry but somebody must have the guts to step up and slap them down. I will...how about you? Deb
people keep talking about how the 1960s are playing out now. i don’t think the 1960s are relevent, more like the 1860s coming around again
Her defense for this trivial change seemed to be that the American people (ha, it's all really about the dems and getting permanent control, but I digress) need to know where the money is being allocated. She seemed to be saying that (paraphrasing), 'The American people need to know where the money is going; not just into a vast action call The Global War on Terror.'
I took away from this ditzo's reasoning that legislation/expenditures would have to be damned near itemized which would make it easy for the enemy to gain intelligence on our strategy.
Btw, does anyone know when the 'pubs are going to fight back like something important is at stake?
Their goal is to craft an atmosphere where they can attack the War in Iraq (ie. GWB), but claim “Patriotism” when they tacitly support the War in Afghanistan. To have their cake, the two must be seperated. The Global War On Terror combines the two wars into one.
P.S.
Robert The Bruce (Sr.)
“We will embrace this rebellion. You will support it from our lands in the north. I will gain English favor by condemning it, and ordering it opposed from our lands in the south. Sit down. Stay a while.”
It continues to be the Global War on Terror no matter what the dems choose to call it. Their refusal to include the battle in Iraq as part of the WOT indicates their awareness of its importance to the overall success of this fight for survival.
Thanks to you and Derek for your commitment to our national security.
Thank you! I guess I will begin by continuing to call “it” what “it” is....THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR
Deb
Folks don’t want to believe that we may well , in fact, appear to be waging a war here in this country for its very existence.. not a war fought on cornfields and in open pastures but on soundstages and websites.. and not a war between northerners and southerners but of ideologies and punditry
Things change, things stay the same.. Only updateder.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.