[verum ago]

I know this isn't really a comment posting thread, but I feel compelled to point out the quote below for the danger it represents in potentially eroding 2nd amendment freedoms:

What we try to stress to people is that deadly force, the use of a firearm, is never justified under any circumstances to protect property

that's right, you can't defend your property now, or so they desire. Think about what this means.

[PeterFinn]

Feel free to post comments all you want. Also feel free to send a few to the Communists at the Sacramento City Police Department.

http://www.sacpd.org/complaint_online.asp

[conserveababe]

I had an incident once where I came back to my car in the mall parking lot and found somone trying to break in. He took off when I confronted him, but car thieves can (and have) attacked the owner in this kind of situation. If that happens and the criminal is shot, isn’t the whole incident the criminal’s fault? Would the potential victim be charged with “escalating” the situation (for confronting the criminal instead of running away) by a politically correct wusses’ court?

I fear for the future of justice.