Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeterFinn
Most jurisdictions have self defense defined as imminent danger to your person. Use of a firearm to protect personal property does not fall under any category where you can use deadly force.

Now, if you interrupt a thief stealing and he turns on you and you feel your life threatened, then you can use deadly force.

I believe the only crime you can shoot someone without a direct threat is arson, at least here in NM.

10 posted on 04/04/2007 6:34:29 PM PDT by Pistolshot (Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pistolshot

right on the money. most of the firearm course and personal defense course instructors spend quite a bit of class time teaching when you can/when you can’t under the current laws. in most states this case would fall under can’t if all the facts of the story are accurate. do I agree with these laws as written as personal property theft is a can’t? HELL NO!!!!!!


14 posted on 04/04/2007 6:54:07 PM PDT by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Pistolshot
I believe the only crime you can shoot someone without a direct threat is arson, at least here in NM.

Moral of the story: carry a lighter with your hogleg.

26 posted on 04/04/2007 8:12:00 PM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson