To: blam
4 posted on
04/04/2007 1:10:15 PM PDT by
johnny7
("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
To: johnny7; JamesP81; blam
That’s just so wrong ping!
7 posted on
04/04/2007 1:11:34 PM PDT by
Froufrou
To: johnny7
9 posted on
04/04/2007 1:12:07 PM PDT by
digger48
To: johnny7
Waxman is looking more and more like Yoda every day!
To: johnny7
If he has any offspring at all, it’s against all odds.
To: johnny7
Separated At Birth![](http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-5/1013654/waxman1.jpg)
![](http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-5/1013654/waxman3.jpg)
36 posted on
04/04/2007 1:19:05 PM PDT by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: johnny7
I wonder if Waxman has been a lifelong smoker, with those pronounced airholes.
To: johnny7
To: johnny7
Yeah, but Waxman isn’t in the gene pool. (if you get my [genetic] drift)...
104 posted on
04/04/2007 2:04:08 PM PDT by
null and void
(To Marines, male bonding happens in Boot Camp, to Democrats, it happens at a Gay Pride parade...)
To: johnny7
that is exactly who I thought of! LMAO!
125 posted on
04/04/2007 2:19:35 PM PDT by
RDTF
(They should have put down Barbarella instead of Barbaro)
To: johnny7
Henry Waxman and Helen Thomas do not require any explanation under evolutionary biology because they are most certainly not of human origins........ whatever processes create hideous alien creatures, if they even have a gene pool, must be different than what creates human beings.
127 posted on
04/04/2007 2:33:04 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Liefong, Fitzfong, Earlefong, Schumfong, Waxfong, Pelosifong.... see a pattern here?!?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson