Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC: Iran 'to release British sailors' ~
BBC ^ | Wednesday, 4 April 2007, 13:46 GMT 14:46 UK | BBC Staff

Posted on 04/04/2007 6:55:50 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Iran 'to release British sailors'

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad awarded medals to Iranian commanders

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says 15 British naval personnel captured in the Gulf will be freed.

He repeated allegations that the British sailors and marines "invaded" Iranian waters, but said they would be freed as a "gift" to Britain.

He made the announcement at a news conference, in which he also awarded medals to the commanders who captured the British personnel in the Gulf.

He said the Britons would be released immediately and taken to an airport.

"They are free after this meeting and can go back to their families," Mr Ahmadinejad said.

The British government was not even brave enough to tell their people the truth

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

"I'm asking Mr Blair to not put these 15 personnel on trial because they admitted they came to Iranian territorial water," he said, referring to taped "confessions" made by the British sailors and marines.

"I ask Mr Blair: Instead of occupying the other countries, I ask Mr Blair to think about the justice, to think about the truth and work for the British people not for himself."

Britain says the 15 were in Iraqi waters under a UN mandate when they were captured nearly two weeks ago. It says the confessions were extracted under duress.

"Unfortunately the British government was not even brave enough to tell their people the truth, that it made a mistake," Mr Ahmadinejad said.

"We have every right to put these people on trial," he asserted.

"But I want to give them as a present to the British people to say they are all free."

A spokesman for Prime Minister Tony Blair said: "We welcome what the president has said about the release of our 15 personnel. We are now establishing exactly what this means in terms of the method and timing of their release."

'Causing misery'

Mr Ahmadinejad also criticised the US-led invasion of Iraq and Israel's war in Lebanon.

He used a news conference marking the Persian New Year to condemn the countries he said were behind "misery" and "destruction" in the world.

He said there did not appear to be anyone "to stand up and defend the rights of those oppressed".

He opened the news conference with references to the Islamic holy book, the Koran, then made a wide-ranging speech about the modern history of the Middle East, while attacking the West.

The invasion of Iraq was based on the false premise that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, he said, but even now "the occupation forces continue to stay there and people are still being killed".



TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ahmadinejad79; iraaaan; iran; nukes; sanctions; uk; ukhostages
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Did Nancy achieve this or was it the USS Nimitz sailing out of San Diego heading for the Persian Gulf....?
1 posted on 04/04/2007 6:55:53 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jeffers; doug from upland
USS Nimitz Deploys To Persian Gulf (Godspeed, Josh)
2 posted on 04/04/2007 6:58:28 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It wasn’t either. They saw the B2’s flying over.


3 posted on 04/04/2007 6:58:40 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

With the overlap, three carrier groups there was probably slightly intimidating.


4 posted on 04/04/2007 7:03:40 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Got a Son in Law helping with supply of Equipment for the Army .... in Kuwait....


5 posted on 04/04/2007 7:07:36 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I suspect that the released Iranian diplomat held by "iraqi terrorists" in Iraq a few days ago was part of a bigger behind the scenes swap tit-for-tat deal.
Wait a few weeks for a few more Iranians being held in Iraq to be returned.
6 posted on 04/04/2007 7:12:14 AM PDT by Riodacat (Ignorance is bliss. Knowledge, truth and reality sucks....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; blam; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; Allegra; tobyhill; ...
Related thread:

Lawrence Eagleburger on Neal Cavuto's Show

7 posted on 04/04/2007 7:14:50 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

See, told you all they’d be free soon. The Brits rightly stayed cool as cucumbers and didn’t get aggressive and war mongering bleating about what they would do to Iran if they weren’t freed......and alls well that ends well. They are comin’ home.

Triumph for the British stiff upper lip and cool head. Iran couldn’t goad Britain into reacting like fools so they gave up and called it quits.

Love it!


8 posted on 04/04/2007 7:15:00 AM PDT by kopite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I don’t think Iran was intimidated at all by our three carriers.

They got what they wanted out of this incident. They made their point, won the battle, made hay without feeding the horse.

They proved that Britain will not defend its people in real time.

Like we didn’t retaliate when our Embassy was overrun. Or our marines killed in Lebanon, or in Somalia.

No defense in real time, and no retaliation later on.

Iran won.


9 posted on 04/04/2007 7:16:37 AM PDT by Basheva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kopite
Would you say that once they’re released the UK should bomb the hell out of Iran to make sure it doesn’t happen again?
10 posted on 04/04/2007 7:18:42 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kopite

That’s an ‘interesting’ take.

The hostages have outlived their usefulness.
Britain failed the test and in doing do, have invited future difficulties as Islamists ramp up their aggression.


11 posted on 04/04/2007 7:19:19 AM PDT by AIM-54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kopite

At least someone has things in perspective.

That said, next time Iran pulls this I would hope that our servicemen aren’t out of range of the appropriate backup.


12 posted on 04/04/2007 7:24:58 AM PDT by FostersExport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

God bless him.


13 posted on 04/04/2007 7:29:53 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kopite
Iran couldn’t goad Britain into reacting like fools so they gave up and called it quits.

Spinning total humiliation into some kind of victory?

Keeping a stiff upper lip had nothing to do with it, the Brit's and the U.S. paid a very high price for this so called "gift" from the Iranians.

14 posted on 04/04/2007 7:31:02 AM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Basheva; kopite
Interesting how people can have such different views of the same set of facts.
15 posted on 04/04/2007 7:36:45 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; Riodacat; Basheva; tobyhill; kopite; AIM-54; FostersExport; Realism
Have we a possible connection with this:

Report: Envoy to meet detained Iranians ~ detained in raid on terrorists at Irbil, Iraq....

16 posted on 04/04/2007 7:36:51 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Well, there’s nothing wrong in letting their (Iran’s) envoy meet with them. Hope we have someone from our side present and able to understand Farsi.

That way the envoy can report how we are starving them, torturing them, taking away their prayer rugs, making them pat pigs, and otherwise keeping them from their 72 virgin reward.


17 posted on 04/04/2007 7:48:45 AM PDT by Basheva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

that would be even worse - Brits held hostage and the US capitulates. wow.


18 posted on 04/04/2007 7:49:37 AM PDT by AIM-54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kopite

“reacting like fools” LMAO

What the Iranians saw were cowards not worth the waste of their time.


19 posted on 04/04/2007 7:52:33 AM PDT by owhl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Realism

You call ‘humiliation’ (not sure how it’s ‘total’) a very high price?

What would a few dead soldiers count as - the impending apocalypse?


20 posted on 04/04/2007 7:54:56 AM PDT by FostersExport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson