Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach

Rudy is pro-abortion. Do you consider that something to overlook, or a plus?


103 posted on 04/04/2007 10:00:37 AM PDT by Petronski (FRED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski

I’ve stated this a gazillion times.

1) If social issues were so darned important to the Republican party, maybe Newt should have taken the time to write just a few short sentences about those issues in his Contract for America. He found the time to write about welfare and other issues that Republicans were working on and that are part of the party platform with regard to personal responsibility.

2) The states have had better luck dealing with abortion issues than the feds have had in 30 years and Rudy is all for state’s rights which, last I knew, is what conservatives WANTED.

3) Ted Olson has known Rudy for over 25 years and says they’ve talked about this matter and Olson is convinced Rudy will appoint strict constructionists if he gets to make SCOTUS appointments. I know that freepers are throwing everyone under the bus if they say a kind word about Rudy or endorse him in any way (which Ted did) but I refuse to dishonor Barbara’s memory by talking about Ted in such ugly terms and I take him at his word.

4) There are many kinds of conservatives. Fiscal, law and order, social, etc. I don’t consider someone who is pro choice to be a plus to the party, but I hardly think it should disqualify someone as qualified as Rudy from the presidency, nor do I think it should result in such a meltdown among socons and others on this forum.


104 posted on 04/04/2007 10:09:55 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons' pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson