Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jonah Goldberg: Gunning for 2nd Amendment, the left admits a defeat
Union Leader ^ | 4/3/07 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 04/03/2007 5:57:12 AM PDT by dashing doofus

CONSIDERING HOW badly things have been going for conservatives, right-wingers, Republicans and anyone else whose brain doesn't explode like one of those guys from the movie "Scanners" at the thought of another Republican President, it's worth noting that one of the greatest conservative victories of the last 40 years is quietly unfolding right in front of us. On March 9, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an epochal ruling. The court found that the Second Amendment actually protects the right to bear arms for individuals.

Now, that in and of itself is huge. For decades, the courts, the legal and academic establishments, the press and all right-thinking people everywhere have been arguing that not only is the Second Amendment a chestnut from a bygone age, but that enlightened judges should just go ahead and void the darn thing like a bad parking ticket.

(Excerpt) Read more at unionleader.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: explodinghead; scanners
Nice editorial. Comments on the recent DC ruling upholding the Second Amendment.
1 posted on 04/03/2007 5:57:13 AM PDT by dashing doofus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dashing doofus

Don’t fool yourself.

They’ll be back.


2 posted on 04/03/2007 6:06:16 AM PDT by AIM-54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dashing doofus

This DID say the Ninth Circuit, didn’t it?

The most overturned court in America?

That may well be the intent - to have SCOTUS scuttle yet another 9th Court decision....


3 posted on 04/03/2007 6:10:20 AM PDT by Old Sarge (+ /_\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dashing doofus

What they can’t do directly they can still do indirectly under the guise of “regulating commerce” as long as the New Deal commerce clause interpretation stands.


4 posted on 04/03/2007 6:14:41 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dashing doofus

“If liberals interpreted the Second Amendment the way they interpret the rest of the Bill of Rights, there would be law professors arguing that gun ownership is mandatory.”


5 posted on 04/03/2007 6:28:52 AM PDT by mutantcoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mutantcoil
“If liberals interpreted the Second Amendment the way they interpret the rest of the Bill of Rights, there would be law professors arguing that gun ownership is mandatory.”

Man, is THAT well put!!!

6 posted on 04/03/2007 6:30:59 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
This DID say the Ninth Circuit, didn’t it?

The most overturned court in America?

Take another look, Sarge. The ruling was on March 9th in the D.C. Circuit Court, not the 9th Circuit Court.

7 posted on 04/03/2007 6:42:05 AM PDT by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bosco

*grumbles*

I think my eyes still have Iraq dust in them....


8 posted on 04/03/2007 6:46:04 AM PDT by Old Sarge (+ /_\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mutantcoil

The HUGE mistake in the liberal thinking is that in saying we don’t have a right to shout fire in a crowded theatre therefore we don’t have a right to own assault weapons as rights are not absolute.
But not having the means to exercise a right is not the same as it being illegal to exercise that right in certain circumstances.
Making it illegal to own certain weapons so we don’t abuse them is like removing our vocal chords so we can’t shout fire in a crowded theatre.


9 posted on 04/03/2007 7:04:39 AM PDT by smoketree (the insanity, the lunacy these days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson