Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage; The_Eaglet
BS. He and other prolifers such as I do not want federal government involvement. It is a States Rights issue. Roe vs. Wade must be overturned. FDT never ‘declared’ such a thing as you suggest, he stated he is against federal government involvement.

I agree that Murder (including abortion-murder) is a State's Issue (the Constitution leaves most issues of Common Law -- such as Murder, Theft, Fraud, etc. -- up to the several States to define and punish). However, all reports of FDT's 1994 campaign indicate that he did favor the legality of first-trimester Abortion:

Like I said -- I agree that it is Constitutionally "enough" to seek the Repeal of Roe vs. Wade so that lawmaking concerning Abortion-Murder can be returned to the States, and at least those 30 or 35 States where Pro-Life Majorities hold sway can restrict or prohibit Abortion. That is MY position, that is Ron Paul's position, that is the position of "America's Only 100% Pro-Life Party (The Constitution Party), and I hope and believe that it is Fred Thompson's position.

But it's just not true to say that Thompson has always been 100% Pro-Life or has ever been a Pro-Life Leader. You said yourself, "those that recognize their mistakes and correct them are worth voting for", and that is to Thompson's credit on the Abortion issue; but he did NOT declare himself Pro-Life in '94. He was Pro-Choice in the First Trimester, with restrictions. That was his position.

I already stated my opinion, that it is no longer correct to define Fred Thompson's position as "Pro-Choice" -- I don't think that's accurate or fair given his current stance. But it's re-writing history to say that he was always "Pro-Life".

89 posted on 04/03/2007 9:43:03 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

It’s not rewriting history to say FDT is prolife. Show just one vote of his that was prochoice.

You won’t find any.

FDT is undeniably prolife.


90 posted on 04/03/2007 9:55:08 AM PDT by Hostage (I'm a Fredhead and I vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

I will go with the opinion of the National Right to Life organization over that of the AP.


107 posted on 04/03/2007 10:42:12 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Thompson/Watts in 2008!! Fear the Fred!! FreeRepublic is FRed country!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
I already stated my opinion, that it is no longer correct to define Fred Thompson's position as "Pro-Choice" -- I don't think that's accurate or fair given his current stance. But it's re-writing history to say that he was always "Pro-Life".

Where did Thompson say that he is pro-life and not pro-choice with exceptions?

147 posted on 04/03/2007 11:08:19 PM PDT by The_Eaglet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson