Your spin has been squashed numerous times here on FR. The fact that you continue to pass it around as if it were fact shows you are more interested in spreading disinformation than in sharing valid information.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1805399/posts
and outright pointing to Romney disinformation:
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=11198
Thompson, who has made it clear that he does not support Roe v. Wade, and who was certified as pro-life by the National Right to Life Committee back in 1994, has continued to state that he is pro-life.
But the Evangelicals for Mitt, using research provided by the Romney campaign, has been putting out information on its blog that Thompson, as well as other Republican Senate candidates, were not.
Okay.
Fact is, I've been paying attention to Politics for a long time, and I happen to know that Thompson ran as moderate Pro-Choicer in 1994. Just as I'm aware that Steve Forbes ran as a moderate Pro-Choicer in 1996 (which is why, much as I liked his Flat Tax, I couldn't vote for him in 1996).
But, here's the scoop: I've been telling my FRiend, "The_Eaglet", to lay off Fred Thompson because I think he's probably come around to the Pro-Life Position. I've been trying to defend Fred.
But apparently that doesn't matter to you. Apparently, you want War.
Okay... shall we discuss Fred's betrayal of the Republican Party in assaulting President Nixon? Or perhaps his pork-belly lobbying for the deregulation and bail-out of the S&Ls to the benefit of his Financier buddies with zero concern whatsoever for the losses suffered by small-town widows and orphans? Or shall I get TRULY tawdry and discuss his Biblically-Unjustified First Divorce, his Womanizings, and his latest marriage to a Trophy Wife half his age? How much do you want, Kemosabe??
I've been trying to defend Fred.
But catch some AC/DC:
If you say that I am Fred Thompson's enemy...
Then, fine. I will be.
Your Choice... but you ain't seen nothing yet.
OP