[Oztrich Boy]

Asides from the "evil" AP, the National Review was also lying in 1994 about his being pro-choice?

Yes, the NR (or actually just one writer on it) was.

[dangus]

>>>> Asides from the "evil" AP, the National Review was also lying in 1994 about his being pro-choice? <<<<

>> Yes, the NR (or actually just one writer on it) was. <<

I believe the NR was guilty of faulty analysis, not of deceit. NR did correct the matter and desisted calling Thompson "pro-choice." But I think it's about time Luis Gonzalez does likewise. I think Luis did a valuable service by introducing the FACT that Thompson has a history of being soft on abortion, but out of fairness and truthfulness, Luis, I think you should stop pushing people towards the INFERENCE that Thompson is pro-choice.

Frankly, Luis, you are too honorable to be written off as a RudyBot or anyone's bot, but your credibility is best served by pulling back to what you know. We can make our inferences on our own, pushing your own presumption so hard only invites unfortunate questions of your credibility which undermine your very valid concerns.