Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tennmountainman
I understand that.

All I objected to was your inappropriate and inaccurate reference to 'vigilantes' where it didn't belong for the sole purpose of an irrelevant slam on the President.

I'm sorry that you have continued to (deliberately?) misunderstand what I was saying to you.

In addition, what I object to in other comments here is the preposterous accusation that President Bush or the Republican party wants Hillary Clinton to win the election so that they can continue their 'coverup.'

It was, as I said, like being in the Twilight Zone to read such bizarre tinfoil accusations of one of the most honorable men to ever occupy the White House.

I have the show on DVR now, and plan to watch it as soon as I can. When I came to this thread last night to find out what the show was about, I saw your non-relevant accusation as deliberate interference in the serious discussion of the show itself. I figured that was your goal then, and have not been convinced otherwise since.

585 posted on 04/01/2007 2:59:27 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PRAY for our President and our troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]


To: ohioWfan

If you had warched the show, you would understand my comparrison to the border agents and Libby going to jail, yet Sandy Burglar walks free. I think another poster tied to point that out to you with no avail.

You can call me whatever name you want to call me. The fact is the Bush Justice Department allowed Sandy Burglar to walk free, NOT the MSM and NOT the democrats.

If that does not bother you, what can I say other than the fact that it bothers a lot of other law abiding american citizens.


586 posted on 04/01/2007 3:12:14 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson