1 posted on
03/31/2007 4:27:39 PM PDT by
blam
To: blam
There is no way we will be able to keep up our Naval Dominance with a two hundred and seventy something Navy. Things need to chance quickly in how we treat our navy or some day in the not too distant future, we will be ceding the seas to other powers.
2 posted on
03/31/2007 4:33:42 PM PDT by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: blam
Make Taiwan nuclear with some serious rocketry to match.
3 posted on
03/31/2007 4:34:58 PM PDT by
GSlob
To: blam
When the USSR fell, the US Navy basically stopped practicing ASW. Now, 15 years later, the Navy is scrambling to recreate some of the vast expertise lost.
More.7 posted on
03/31/2007 4:45:39 PM PDT by
pabianice
To: blam
If Bush were running China, what would he do?
9 posted on
03/31/2007 7:41:34 PM PDT by
Jeff Gordon
(History convinces me that bad government results from too much government. - Thomas Jefferson)
To: blam
China and India - the two emergent superpowers of the Asia-Pacific region Oh please could we ONE time discuss China without all the hysteric chicken little drama queen hype? The difference in capability between the current US Navy and any fleet China can buy/build in the next 50 years is the different between a NFL superbowl winner and the local JR High School flag football team.
11 posted on
04/01/2007 6:04:53 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(If you will try being smarter, I will try being nicer.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson