To: highlander_UW
One might guess that Bruce Bower is not an ID advocate...so you're turning to critics of a view for the definition of that view? You don't think critics of a particular viewpoint should attempt to define that viewpoint?
Boy, a lot of creationists on this site are going to be after you!
If they can't come up with strawman definitions of evolution what will they do?
;-)
82 posted on
03/31/2007 3:47:09 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman
If they can't come up with strawman definitions of evolution what will they do? Start spamming threads with the same cut and pastes over and over again?
101 posted on
03/31/2007 4:10:48 PM PDT by
Hacksaw
(Appalachian by the grace of God!)
To: Coyoteman
my point was that you utilized a faulty definition from a adversary of ID for the definition of ID. If that's too subtle for you I apologize. Opposing views, of course, can and must examine the validity of other views...but did you consider, perhaps for just a moment, to take a definition FROM ID advocates as to what ID is?
119 posted on
03/31/2007 4:40:06 PM PDT by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson