Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EveningStar
If the current crop of books want to keep drumming up the old piltdown, peking, zinj. etc. fossils it's the same old fakes.

When they start reading what's out there about c14 dating methods, geologocal columns, circulart dating (rocks date fossils, fossils date rocks) and and poly-strat fossils as well as hundreds of "out of place" fossil finds, the real leading edge studies will be discussed.

Until then there are few who are studied enough to present it (self included). The problem is not that enough evidence is available to leave macro-evolutionary theory in shambles, it's that if any one of science talks about it they lose their jobs and have their grants withdrawn.

my two cents.

40 posted on 03/31/2007 2:40:13 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (I buy gas for my Hummer with the Carbon Offsets I sell on Ebay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


http://www.math.tulane.edu/~polofsson/


41 posted on 03/31/2007 2:42:21 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: K4Harty
When they start reading what's out there about c14 dating methods...

I do a lot of radiocarbon dating.

Do you have any specific problems you can share with us?

69 posted on 03/31/2007 3:25:25 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson