Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill calls for NAFTA pullout
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | March 31, 2007

Posted on 03/31/2007 3:17:03 AM PDT by Man50D

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Man50D

How refreshing it is to see that some of our elected representatives realize what these unconstitutional trade agreements are doing to America and they have backbone enough to do something about it. NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT and any other unconstitutional trade agreements are a threat to our sovereignty and should never have been signed to begin with. It's not just the trade deficits these trade agreements bring, but it's criminals, disease, gangs, terrorists, loss of jobs, etc., that are about to destroy our culture; our way of life, and all Bush wants to do is speed up the process to the destruction of America!


21 posted on 03/31/2007 10:23:06 AM PDT by NRA2BFree (Duncan Hunter for President *08 - A genuine "Reagan Republican" for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

If only the United States withdrew from NAFTA: crime would not exist; disease would be eradicated; no one would do drugs, everyone would have a job, candy would fall like raindrops from the sky, and household chores would be performed by giant stalks of talking asparagus.


22 posted on 03/31/2007 11:47:26 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Illegal immigration is a known result of "free trade" agreements.

In the absence of free trade agreements, illegal immigration would not result? Yes, or no?

When launching into a screed, best not to begin with a declarative statement that is itself a logical fallacy.

23 posted on 03/31/2007 11:54:01 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

Thank you!

IMHO, only the WOT is more important than this.


24 posted on 03/31/2007 5:47:30 PM PDT by upchuck (A living, breathing example of the Peter Principle. Oh, forgetful, too :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Maybe the GOP is about to take off the NAFTA-Neocon suicide belt that puts Bush at 35%.


25 posted on 03/31/2007 5:53:49 PM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; Malesherbes; AZRepublican; raybbr; wolfcreek; Hydroshock; calex59; norton; hedgetrimmer; ...

Outstanding.


26 posted on 04/01/2007 10:30:20 PM PDT by ProCivitas (Each Nation Should Be Its Own Best Market First.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

"If only the United States withdrew from NAFTA:"


WOW!, that was a Homer Simpson moment. LOL!


Illegal immigration has dramatically increased since the inception of NAFTA. The Chinese have undercut the entire deal and are in the process of using Mexican labor to gain further footholds in this part of the world.


Free markets are only as good or *bad* as their participants.


27 posted on 04/02/2007 4:59:59 AM PDT by wolfcreek (Semi-Conservatism Won't Cut It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
Illegal immigration has increased because our standard-of-living remains much higher than Mexico's (for a number of reasons), and because we are incapable of enforcing our own immigration laws.

If NAFTA opponents spent as much time and energy on opposing illegal immigration as they do opposing trade agreements, I'd imagine they'd make a difference. The fact that they do not (or that they choose to dilute their efforts) is simply an indication (to me) that they fear illegal immigration less, and trade more.

I think of it the same way as people believing they can solve crime by banning guns.

28 posted on 04/02/2007 5:26:28 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

"If NAFTA opponents spent as much time and energy on opposing illegal immigration as they do opposing trade agreements, I'd imagine they'd make a difference"


I agree. Until all countries, including Mexico and China, become worthy of *fair* trade agreements, they should be exempted. It makes no sense for American workers to take a hit because other countries want to manipulate agreements to their own advantage.


29 posted on 04/02/2007 5:40:09 AM PDT by wolfcreek (Semi-Conservatism Won't Cut It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
and household chores would be performed by giant stalks of talking asparagus.


30 posted on 04/02/2007 7:39:22 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

You frighten me sometimes.


31 posted on 04/02/2007 9:27:07 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
You mean sometimes I don't?
32 posted on 04/02/2007 9:27:58 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson