To: HawaiianGecko
I may be wrong but I'm getting the sense the Gonzales witch hunt isn't doing a thing for the dems. They may just drop it when they realize it's only hurting them with Hispanic voters, and no one else really cares. It looked touch and go for awhile, but maybe the Republicans realized that turning on Bush at this level did nothing for them, and only empowered the dims.
2 posted on
03/30/2007 10:27:18 PM PDT by
Darkwolf377
(Anti-socialist Bostonian, Anti-Illegal Immigration Bush supporter, Pro-Life Atheist)
To: HawaiianGecko
This should be seen by everyone. BTTT
7 posted on
03/30/2007 10:51:41 PM PDT by
KJC1
(Right when you think you're really good is when you need to pay the most attention)
To: nutmeg
8 posted on
03/30/2007 11:18:19 PM PDT by
nutmeg
(The Democrats' "new direction" for Iraq: SURRENDER)
To: HawaiianGecko
If it were not for a totally biased MSM, Democrats could not get away with such hypocrisy. If DiFi were a Republican criticizing a Democrat, her lack of candor would be the lead story in every major newspaper in the United States.
I can not believe someone like DiFi who will make a statement that can so easily be proved false. I will never forget the first time my eyes were opened to the fact that people will actually blatantly lie to make themselves look good or to achieve their own objectives. I was 30 years old and somewhat naive about the personal integrity of others. I took most people at face value and believed that everyone was basically honest. I was working in a hospital microbiology laboratory under a supervisor who was always trying to make herself look good at the expense of others. One day, the pathologist came by and asked her a question about a particular patient's results. I was the only other technologist in the department at the time. She out and out lied to him knowing she was lying and knowing that I knew she was lying. I think my mouth dropped open as I stared at her in disbelief.
Now at well over 50, I would not hesitate to call her on it, but at the time I was too intimidated by her and too speechless to say a word. Though she got away with it, the experience taught me a valuable lesson and showed me that she could not be trusted - a fatal flaw in someone who held the well-being and even the lives of patients in her hands. I have been teaching in the field for over 20 years and she has long since left the profession. The last I heard, she was a financial planner - another unfortunate choice of professions for a dishonest person.
9 posted on
03/31/2007 2:34:48 AM PDT by
srmorton
(Choose Life!)
To: Peach
10 posted on
03/31/2007 3:57:56 AM PDT by
Peach
(The Clinton's' pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: HawaiianGecko
The Defeatocrats return to power only mean one thing, look for the skeletons, create the scandals, build up a hatred for Republicans,
by any means necessary, so the chances of winnning in '08 are better.
That's what this is all about. It's not about if the DOJ was right, or the President has the authority to fire US Attorneys that are not doing their job. It is about creating the illusion there has been any wrong-doing by the administration and by Republicans are not to be trusted.
Will Waxman's committee investigate kickbacks to DiFi's husband? Only when hell freezes over, and she had the gall to admonish the administration for the Walter Reed fiasco, when her husband controlled the companies that were supposed to perform the modifications to the buildings that are in question.
This is about an effort to stay in power, nothing more.
12 posted on
03/31/2007 5:36:01 AM PDT by
Pistolshot
(Thompson '08)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson