[Mr. Jeeves]

I don't think it was me - I try to avoid this topic, which did a lot to cost the GOP the House and Senate in 2006. Big Government interfering in what appears to the public to be personal life decisions (regardless of the unprovable criminality of the husband) is a sure loser in any election campaign.

[Hildy]

But the story has morphed into sheer mythical proportions here. The lies are repeated over and over and, like I said on another thread, the obsession with her is almost beyond explanation. Although I do have my own personal theories as to why this became the huge issue it did.

[wagglebee]

I try to avoid this topic, which did a lot to cost the GOP the House and Senate in 2006.

FACT: EVERY candidate Michael Schiavo campaigned for in 2006 lost.

Big Government interfering in what appears to the public to be personal life decisions (regardless of the unprovable criminality of the husband) is a sure loser in any election campaign.

FACT: Terri was awarded money for her rehabilitation.
FACT: Michael used the money for court battles which HE INITIATED to kill her.

So, it was the culture of death that you support that brought this matter into the courts.

[erton1]

I agree with you re: 2006 election. Please see my post 155 on this thread.

[Terriergal]

I try to avoid this topic,

Coulda fooled us!

[Terriergal]

Big Government interfering in what appears to the public to be personal life decisions (regardless of the unprovable criminality of the husband) is a sure loser in any election campaign.

Yeah like the defeat of Republicans this past fall was because they weren't liberal enough.