To: neverdem
>The Parker case breaks from this precedent
Piss on precedent, Parker broke from history and principle.
7 posted on
03/30/2007 5:23:29 PM PDT by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: AZRepublican
"Piss on precedent, Parker broke from history and principle."
It didn't, of course. Unless you count the recent history of gun control.
21 posted on
03/30/2007 6:34:59 PM PDT by
FredHunter08
(Guiliani! Come and Take Them!)
To: AZRepublican
The Parker case reinstated the correct reading of the Second Amendment - but it helps to keep in mind liberalism's ideal is not freedom; it is servitude to the state.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
43 posted on
03/30/2007 8:22:45 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: AZRepublican
"Piss on precedent, Parker broke from history and principle."No, it did not. It affirmed what was written in the Constitution.
58 posted on
03/30/2007 11:20:55 PM PDT by
spunkets
("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson