Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
in other words, you want "to have your cake & eat it too?????"

SORRY, but it doesn't work that way.

was the DAMNyankee controlled Congress legitimate because the southern states had lawfully seceded and a quorum existed without those states??? OR

was the 1961-65 Congress totally ILLEGITIMATE & all the actions of that "congress" FRAUDULENT???

so PICK ONE. (there are NO other acceptable answers.)

free dixie,sw

283 posted on 04/05/2007 2:19:10 PM PDT by stand watie ("Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God." - T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]


To: stand watie
so PICK ONE. (there are NO other acceptable answers.)

OK, I pick Congress was legitimate. What makes you say it wasn't?

284 posted on 04/05/2007 2:41:48 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]

To: stand watie
was the DAMNyankee controlled Congress legitimate because the southern states had lawfully seceded and a quorum existed without those states???

Again you seem incapable of asking the right question. The secession of the southern states was illegal, but since a quorum of congress is a simple majority, they were fully capable of having a quorum without the southern representatives.

Here are the numbers:

Size of congress, as determined by 1860 census: 241

Number necessary for a quorum: 122

Number of southern representives; 63

Remaining congressmen: 178.

On the senate side, 22 senators walked out leaving 48. 36 would be enough for a quorum.

285 posted on 04/05/2007 2:45:23 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson