He didn't fail the bar exam. He taught at the University of Chicago Law School. Since he was in the top of his class at Harvard Law School, he's probably not a legal idiot.
Nevertheless, even the greatest constitutional law expert probably should not brag that they are one.
I don't understand this clause. The end is redundant.
No, maybe he's not an 'legal' idiot.
Does he know how to start a lawnmower, or change the oil? Does he know how to clean the gutters on a house? Does he know how to use the scanner at a market place? (hey, bodyguards, what's a debit card?)
My point being he taught at Chicago. BFD!