Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Serbia: The Betting Pool
A Fistful of Euros ^ | 3/29/07 | Douglas Muir

Posted on 03/30/2007 9:47:05 AM PDT by Serb29

By pure coincidence, next month brings not one but two major turning points for Serbia.

First, there’s the Ahtisaari plan for Kosovo. As we all know, the plan would give Kosovo de facto independence. On one hand, that’s just recognizing reality on the ground; 90% of Kosovo’s population wants nothing to do with Serbia, and they’ve been running their own house for almost a decade now. On the other hand, it would involve UN approval of the involuntary dismemberment of an unwilling member state. That’s never happened before, and it would be a big step into the unknown.

The plan goes before the UN Security Council next week, and it’s really not clear what will happen. Either Russia or China might veto it — Russia because of its traditional support of Serbia, China because of concerns about Taiwan. On the other hand, neither one may want to be responsible for vetoing a plan that has broad support in both the Security Council and the General Assembly.

Meanwhile, Serbia’s quarrelsome parties are still trying to form a government. They’ve been at it since the elections on January 21, so as of today they’ve gone 67 days without success. That would be amusing, except that if a government isn’t formed within 90 days, Serbia’s Constitution requires new elections. That would throw Serbia into a major political crisis.

Here’s the thing: I could see either of these going either way. The UNSC might approve the Ahtisaari plan, or reject it; Serbia’s parties might reach agreement, or not.

So how about a betting pool?

There are four possible outcomes here: plan passes and government forms, plan but no government, government but no plan, neither government nor plan. Furthermore, since it’s unclear when the UNSC will sit and decide, we could get the plan decision before the government decision, or vice versa. So that makes eight possibilities. Pick one!

I’ll start: I think the Serbs will form a government. I think it will happen at the very last moment, but it’s just hard to imagine they’d be so foolish and so stubborn as to trigger new elections. (Because new elections would favor the Radicals and man, nobody wants that.)

I think the plan will fail. If Russia doesn’t veto it, China will.

And I think the plan decision will come first… the UNSC might foot-drag past April 21, but I’m guessing they’ll cut the knot before then.

Those are my guesses. What do you think?


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: balkans; kosovo; serbia; serbiakosovoun

1 posted on 03/30/2007 9:47:06 AM PDT by Serb29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Serb29

Even if the plan is vetoed by Russia, the Al;banian muzzies who have cleansed Kosovo of most "infidels" will declare it a fait accompli. Will the US then veto any strong action against them?
Jihad comes to Europe...big time.


2 posted on 03/30/2007 9:57:24 AM PDT by steve8714 (If Algore is worried about Global Warming he should become a Vegan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Serb29
Betting on a nation's future. How uncouth.

$50 says that Kosovo won't be independent, UN and EU will dither its thumbs like idiots as usual while Serbia and US develop closer ties.

:)

3 posted on 03/30/2007 9:57:38 AM PDT by Killborn (Age of servitude. A government of the traitors, by the liars, for the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Serb29

I think clinton, blair, and Schroeder fought this illegal war on the wrong side, and the UN has no legal right to break up a sovereign nation.

I also think there's a 90% Albanian majority in Kosovo because Albanians came in over the border until they took over the province.

I also wonder whether the people who want to hand Kosovo over to Greater Albania will want to hand California, Arizona, and New Mexico over to Mexico if the illegal immigrants continue to flood in and start a revolt?


4 posted on 03/30/2007 10:01:14 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

The sad thing is, that the Albanian take-over of Kosovo is financed with US taxpayer´s dollars. Clinton´s legacy has cost more Serbian lives by now, than the number of Albanian lives that he wanted us to believe he was protecting. But hey, it´s all in the name of democracy, right? Of course. Not. It´s amazing what leaders (or: "leaders") can come up with at moments that call for some distraction from scandals (Monica).

It would, indeed, be interesting what the general reaction would be if/when the UN, in its infinite lack of wisdom, decides to hand over parts of the US of A to Mexico. Now, don´t think this is impossible, in fact the very same is being done right now. In Serbia, that is.

www.serbianna.com


5 posted on 03/30/2007 10:31:11 AM PDT by Bazooka (When Tolerance met Indifference, it was love at first sight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson