Replies

So still no evidence to support your claim that "thousands" of Muslim bodies had been "tied up".

Even the wretchedly Serbophobic Dutch report could only manage the following

"In many of the graves, a large number of blindfolds and various restraints - mostly fashioned from iron wire and used to bind wrists or arms - were found. This clearly indicates executions, yet in the mass graves at Nova Kasaba and Konjevic Polje few such clues were found. There had also been combat in this area, and so it is possible that these victims fell on the battlefield. It will never be possible to distinguish victims of the executions from 'regular' casualties of war"

All rather vague. Just how many? And what exactly is a large number ?

You know for a fact we're talking small potatoes here. If, indeed there had've been "thousands", we'd have never heard the end of it.

And the final sentence, It will never be possible to distinguish victims of the executions from 'regular' casualties of war" all but proves my point.

Far, far removed from your bombastic and erroneous "thousands and thousands had been tied up" nonsense.

And in the Krle trial, very few of the bodies unearthed had blindfolds or ligatures. For example, Dr. Clark, the chief pathologist, admitted that only one site he examined - Kozluk - had any at all:

"the fact that Konjevic Polje, Nova Kasaba, and Glogova ( bruial sites ) , none of the victims there had blindfolds or ligatures"