To: DCPatriot
Asking the question, what terminal harm would have come from the Clinton administration if they had admitted that...if that's what happened...right from day one? And I'll ask this question. What idiot would test a missile by firing into the most densly travelled air corridor in the world? What possible reason would anyone have in doing so? What could they possibly be testing?
101 posted on
03/29/2007 5:04:06 PM PDT by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: Non-Sequitur
Indeed. I'm not disputing it would be idiotic. Is that the reason then for the coverup?
The missle came from the water level..so it was either our government or somebody else's...or a terrorist hit.
We don't seem to want to acknowledge a terrorist outfit could pull it off...so?
103 posted on
03/29/2007 5:54:01 PM PDT by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
To: All
Now to all of you, what really happened to the plane that crashed after 9/11 in a suburb of New York and the apparent attempt to claim it was another equipment failure...heh?
who knows the truth about that one?
132 posted on
03/29/2007 8:23:15 PM PDT by
Stayfree
(FLUSH HILLARY CALENDARS ARE THE BEST WAY TO RID US OF THE CLINTONS!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson