Missile Witnesses Needed Now - TWA 800

WorldNet Daily ^ | 29 March 2007 | Jack Cashill

[Hal1950]

So did the fireball that exploded below 7500 feet start climbing after that? Or were those CIA "experts" full of $#!+?

Nobody has ever claimed the huge fireball "climbed".

BTW, Sven Faret & Ken Wendell were not the only airborne witnesses. Those who gave estimates of the altitude of the huge fireball explosion gave these estimates of that explosion: 5/8,000 feet - 5/6,000 feet - 3/5,000 feet - 8,000 feet - 7,500 feet - 7,000 feet and 4/5,000 feet.

[Big Horn]

The book I read convinced me that the downing of flight 800 was terrorist connected.

[ml/nj]

Nobody has ever claimed the huge fireball "climbed".

Some people have claimed that something giving off visible light ascended, that they associate with the TWA 800 catastrophe. What do you think that something was?

ML/NJ

[Steve Van Doorn]

This is a classic example of propaganda by Obtaining Disapproval through False testimonials .

This guy should be ignored.

[Robe]

It had to be a bloody missile, probably an un-armed Tomahawk, going for center-of-mass

All I need to know is this guy can't tell a cruise missile (Tomahawk) from an antiaircraft missile... end of my attention span

[Hal1950]

If you are admitting that the huge fireball explosion took place below 7500 feet, your question is irrelavant.

[ml/nj]

your question is irrelavant. (sic)

Funny. (or maybe not)

When you guys ask questions, I answer them as best as I know how. But you make up non-excuses not to answer.

It's relevant to me. So why not answer it?

ML/NJ

[Hal1950]

Do you now admit that the huge fireball explosion took place below 7500 feet? If your answer is yes, I’ll answer your question. If your answer is no, what evidence specifically are you relying on?

[ml/nj]

So you only have to answer my questions if you like my answers to questions you have asked? I already told you what altitude I think the fireball appeared at.

Go away.

ML/NJ

[Hal1950]

"So you only have to answer my questions if you like my answers to questions you have asked?"

You hadn't answered my question and instead employed your usual tactice of trying to change the subject as documented by your postings in this thread and elsewhere.

"I already told you what altitude I think the fireball appeared at."

And then ignored the overwhelming evidence to the contrary I thereafter provided you with - including the detaled report of Sven Faret & Ken Wendell submitted by conspiracy theorist Ian Goddard and the fireball altitude estimates of the airborned witnesses that leaves no doubt in the minds of objective reviewers that the huge fireball exploded below 7500 feet, not at your preferred altitude of 13,800 feet which again demonstrated your lack of analytical ability for the obvious reason that Faret & Wendell's report is by far the most detailed to be found anywhere whereas McClaine's is both inaccurate and vague.

But you have finally answered the question of where you now stand on the altitude of the huge fireball explosion so I'll now answer your question. Simply put, the location of the huge fireball explosion below 7500 feet rules out the possibility of that any witnesses saw anything unusual in the sky anywhere near 13,800 feet (including the alleged "zoom-climb"). The fiery streak ended at the huge fireball explosion and that was so long after the the initial event at 13,800 feet that it's obvious that (1) the streak was not a missile, and (2) that it was flame from the falling wreckage moments before it ignighted that huge fireball.

"Go away."

In case you haven't noticed, I started this thread. It's been your privilage to leave it at anytime.