Giulianis To Go On Camera, Candidly (Judith and Rudy Will Be on 20/20 Tomorrow)

Newsday ^ | 3/29/07

[areafiftyone]

WASHINGTON - Rudolph Giuliani's wife - joined by the ex-mayor himself - takes to the airwaves tomorrow in an interview the campaign hopes can put to rest questions about their public courtship and life together as presidential candidate and wife.

Judith Giuliani's interview with Barbara Walters is set to air tomorrow, one week after disclosures that she has been married three times, not twice as previously believed.

Giuliani aides refused to divulge what the Giulianis said in the pretaped interview and ABC News also was being tight-lipped, except for a news release promising that Judith Giuliani answers questions about whether "she was responsible for the break up of her husband's second marriage" and her relationship with his children.

Giuliani's three marriages and public split with Donna Hanover already have raised concerns among prominent evangelical Christian leaders, and Giuliani aides portrayed the interview as an attempt to confront the issue head on early in the campaign in the hopes of beginning to move beyond it.

The interview airs at 10 p.m. Friday on ABC's "20/20" program.

[presently no screen name]

me telling the truth about it doesn't make it derogatory.

The truth? Tell me what went on behind "THEIR" closed doors. Just because Rudy didn't blast the mother of his children in public - you assume - it's all about him. Do you do that in your own family? Feel confident to trash them when you REALLY don't know the whole story or ONLY ONE SIDE of it.

[airborne]

RIIIGHT! I'm sure the media will give him a pass, too!

Are you even thinking?

Can you just imagine how the MSM will drag Rudy through the mud?

First wife,second wife, third wife, kids. And that's just the surface !!!

I think it's safe to expect that there are skeletons yet to be revealed!

Wake the hell up !!!

I thought you people said you didn't want Hillary !!

[Victoria Delsoul]

Thanks. I'll make sure to watch it.

[airborne]

See post # 82.

[airborne]

See post # 82.

[dforest]

Ah, a slut and her sugar daddy.

Pardon me, but this one wasn't mine. Don't try to group them. The others are mine. I can say what I want as long as I don't violate the rules. I didn't attribute those words to you. So...don't worry about it.

You might quit acting holier than thou yourself. So don't pretend that you don't do likewise. Rudy is no saint and his past IS going to follow him. It may be quiet now, things have been rolling earlier this cycle. The MSMs are just waiting. It will come in due time. The replay of 2006 will begin.

[oceanview]

they are going to do the same thing to Thompson. young second wife, why did the first marriage break up? I am sure he's had some liasons with "hollywood" babes who will be more then happy to talk.

so what. what's do we need, celibate candidates now?

[airborne]

so what. what's do we need, celibate candidates?

We separate the wheat from the chaff.

You know what you want in a candidate. Don't be afraid. We're all here to help each other.

Have faith that we'll come through this, stronger for the tempering.

It's still early! 8^)

[Ciexyz]

btt

[presently no screen name]

Rudy is no saint and his past IS going to follow him. It may be quiet now,

Good, otherwise he wouldn't get the job of "pastor" that he is running for. He left his past 'personal life' behind - and has gotten on with life. Others just want to shake their little finger - tsk! tsk!

You might quit acting holier than thou

Show me where! Where am I 'standing on principle' on one foot and calling someone vile names or defaming them w/statements as cheating on his current wife w/mistresses on the other foot? Or is this another one of your statements - you said it because you can - free country and all.

The MSM will not call his wife vile names or make assumptions to him that he is cheating on his wife w/mistresses. Even MSM won't go that low. Bottom line is - either Rudy can handle all the crap they will throw at him or he can't. No business of mine. Of course, he will get the worst treatment (twisting of facts) because he is Hillary's greatest threat. They will go easier on the other GOP candidates. Unless, of course, one of them climbs past Rudy in the polls.

[Gracey]

He's like a Kennedy or a Clinton....

---

There's a big difference. Kennedy and Clinton were MARRIED to one woman and had lots of affairs.

Rudy has had serial marriages. His marriage with Donna Hanover was over several years before it was officially over.

[presently no screen name]

The 1993 attack on the WTC should have been treated by Rudy as ample warning........he was the one in charge of the city.

Show me where RUDY was MAYOR in 1993? You are deceitful! You smear and lie to suit your agenda. Just like the MSM - even worse. Certainly not conservative - it's the clinton style - I did it because I can.

[dforest]

I never said he was mayor then. I said he should have seen the 1993 WTC attacks as ample warning it could happen again.

Is your head exploding? He was in charge on 9/11 as you well know.

So cut it out and quit calling me a liar because you were unable to understand my post.

The bold type and drama looks unhinged. I don't think Lil ole me is going to be His Lordship Rudy's biggest problem in the near future.

Rudy comes off affable enough, he just shouldn't be the choice of conservatives.

[proud American in Canada]

Maybe Fred WILL jump in after he stops asking people to "BEG FOR HIM TO RUN" first!

LOL! He seems like a good guy but honestly, he should make a decision on this. IMO.

[presently no screen name]

I never said he was mayor then. I said he should have seen the 1993 WTC attacks as ample warning it could happen again.

"Never said"? Check out your previous post.

The 1993 attack on the WTC should have been treated by Rudy as ample warning. I am sure he was torn apart that day as so many were, but, he was the one in charge of the city. 76 posted on 03/29/2007 10:01:48 PM EDT by indylindy

The mayor is the one 'in charge' and HE WASN"T the MAYOR. More twisting from you to defame - BECAUSE YOU CAN.

[dforest]

You are nuts. Don't worry about it. There is a more accurate, and easier for you to understand thread on this, very subject.

Take a hop over there. Thats the one you need to worry about.

So long.

[presently no screen name]

You are nuts

Typical! Always into name calling; yet, your post prove your lies and when called on it, you say I'm nuts. You have no credibility and; yet, take pride in defaming others - while 'standing on principle'. What a crock! Actions are totally out of the lib book.

easier for you to understand

Easier for ME to understand. You say Rudy was in charge in '93 and then you turn around and say you never said he was mayor. And "I" don't understand? Your constant throwing out whatever you please to DEFAME for an agenda - twists your mind so much - it is YOU who lacks understanding and Truth.

I'm not 'worried' about anything - I ain't hopping for anyone - THAT'S you gig, not mine. Hopping around to see where you can throw out more deception BECAUSE YOU CAN.

[dforest]

Okay St. PNSN

Last time. I explained that which needed to be clarified to you in #93.

I was rather civil, I believe. If you are having trouble getting out of your brain rut, I am sorry for you.

Looks to me like you are trying to instigate a ruckus.

So, for the last time look at #93 and heed your own words about name calling. It is rather immature.

[dforest]

Oh yes, I am a woman with 3 sons and one of them serves in the US Navy. I am perverse because I think Rudy is a pig in a poke.

Get over yourself. You are shameful. I like a person that makes good choices. Rudy does not.

I will take accountability for what I said. Rudy may have not taken office until early 2004, he STILL should have known the WTC could be a target again. Sorry buddy.

I am done with a Rooty buttlicker.