To: Fierce Allegiance
A vote against him is a vote for Clinton, or worse Obama. Your logic is backwords, you are an appeaser of the Democrats, if you choose to sit out the election if Rudy wins our nomination fair and square you are setting back conservatism more than any politican ever could. Giving the Democrats all 3 branches DURING A WAR somehow is true conservative thing to do.
10 posted on
03/29/2007 9:07:44 AM PDT by
ChiTownBearFan
("To see the world is to love America all the more"-Thomas Jefferson)
To: ChiTownBearFan
Fred is more conservative and has less baggage and therefore is more electable.
Besides, I do not think a draft dodger will get many military votes, especially in a time of war.
14 posted on
03/29/2007 9:11:04 AM PDT by
Fierce Allegiance
(There are 2 types of Rudy fans - the uninformed or anti-conservative TROLLS who do not belong on FR)
To: ChiTownBearFan
A vote against him is a vote for Clinton, or worse Obama.
No, the way you should be looking at it is that a vote for Giuliani in the primary is a vote for Clinton/Obama, because conservatives will NOT put him in office. Same for McCain and Romney. You want a Republican to win, then put a conservative in the running. Period.
27 posted on
03/29/2007 9:23:25 AM PDT by
fr_freak
To: ChiTownBearFan
Giuliani is a
liberal. Conservatives do not vote for a
liberal. When I enter the voting booth, I will be voting for a consevative.
The Republicans will do well to field a proven, experienced conservative candidate if they wish conservative support. You have let the media pick your candidates for you (meaning the Republican Party).
Your liberal candidate is no different than Clinton. Let the voters pick their candidate in the primaries.
55 posted on
03/29/2007 9:46:41 AM PDT by
afnamvet
(It is what it is)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson