I can see why some anti-war righties support Paul. There is a clear difference there. I agree with your views on Tancredo. Tancredo is a bomb-thrower, as all activists need to be, and he's won the day on the illegal immigration issue, as even McVAin had to re-evaluate his own immigration positions after getting an earful in Iowa. But bomb-thrower activists don't usually do well in a run for higher office.
But I don't see the Hunter campaign making the early traction needed to organize around the internet activists that is Hunter's core of support now. He's still my first choice, but I'm damn glad that we might have a decent fallback in Fred, because I'm well aware that Hunter is a longshot.
because I'm well aware that Hunter is a longshot.Finally, some rational thoughts from a Hunter supporter. Long-shot is right, like my chances of marrying Miss America