Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/29/2007 6:58:59 AM PDT by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: meg88
Historically, conservatives have opposed free trade, but Thompson, like others, has been "neoconned" into backing it.

Yes, Pat Buchanan conservatives oppose free trade. Ronald Reagan conservatives, not so much. Thompson is closer to Reagan than any of the other mentioned candidates.

2 posted on 03/29/2007 7:03:42 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88
As I've said previously, Mr. Thompson is the most conservative candidate that actually has a chance to win the election. Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo have zero chance of becoming the POTUS.

Considering the very small amount of negatives concerning Mr. Thompson versus the huge negatives that are attached to the rest of the Republican candidates who have a chance to win, the obvious choice is Mr. Thompson, IMO.
3 posted on 03/29/2007 7:03:46 AM PDT by Pox (Just say NO to RINO Rudy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88

Pat Buchanan, is that you? If not, someone else is riding to the sound of your gums.


5 posted on 03/29/2007 7:05:08 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88
There already are two fine conservative candidates seeking the nomination: Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo.

Ron Paul if you wish to cut and run in Iraq. Tancredo's a great activist, but such figures seldom do well in pursuit of higher office.

Hunter is a great congressman and is still my ideological first choice, but I don't see his campaign doing the right things to get traction, and he's running out of time in a hurry.

Meanwhile, if the tin-eared type who wrote this bothered to listen to Thompson's more recent positions, he realizes we need enforcement first. Which is a sane approach no matter what your opinions as to how this country should handle the illegals already here.

Plus, compare Thompson to Rudy, McVain and Romney. The half-empty glass quickly looks half-full.

6 posted on 03/29/2007 7:05:51 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88
neocon

Sorry, Basil ... you used the "n" word.

I stopped reading, right there ... you have no credibility.

7 posted on 03/29/2007 7:06:25 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88

Why are neoncons backing Thompson? Ideally, being ex-Trotskyites themselves, neocons would prefer a liberal candidate, like McCain, Giuliani or Romney. But they see that conservatives deplore these candidates, and now are going to try to peddle Fred Thompson, who is just socially conservative enough and just tough enough on the borders, even if it is feigned, to woo naive GOP voters. But let's hope this nefarious neocon plot fails.



So we can get a full blooded liberal like Giuliani?


8 posted on 03/29/2007 7:06:26 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88

Fred Thompson:
~snip~

I think its time for a little plain talk to the leaders of Mexico. Something like:
hey guys, you’re our friends and neighbors and we love you but it’s time you had a little dose of reality. A sovereign nation loses that status if it cannot secure its own borders and we are going to do whatever is necessary to do so, although our policies won’t be as harsh as yours are along your southern border. And criticizing the U.S. for alternately doing too much and too little to stop your illegal activities is not going to set too well with Americans of good will who are trying to figure a way out of the mess that your and our open borders policy has already created.

My friends, it’s also time for a little introspection. Since we all agree that improving Mexico’s economy will help with the illegal-immigration problem, you might want to consider your own left-of -center policies. For example, nationalized industries are not known for enhancing economic growth. Just a thought. But here’s something even more to the point that you might want to think about: What does it say about the leadership of a country when that country’s economy and politics are dependent upon the exportation of its own citizens?
~snip~

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjhkYzZiNTAxZjAyZTNjNzkxNjA2ZTNmNDBhNjhlYWU=


9 posted on 03/29/2007 7:06:36 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88

I like Tancredo and Ron Paul, although I think we've got to be more offensive in the WOT than Paul would be. I'll likely cast a vote for Tancredo in the primary, though it could be Duncan Hunter.

That out of the way, Tancredo may get my vote and his, but he ain't getting the nomination.


10 posted on 03/29/2007 7:07:39 AM PDT by SittinYonder (Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88
"Fred Thompson: Neocon Globalist"

LOL! If Fred Thompson is a "Neocon Globalist" then what does this make Giuliani, McCain and Romney? Communist dictators?

11 posted on 03/29/2007 7:08:05 AM PDT by TommyDale ("Rudy can win the War on Terror!" Perhaps, but for whose side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88
Fred Thompson isn't the pick of the media. We will see him ignored as much as possible, unless something negative turns up.

The media likes McCain, Giuliani and Romney because they will be the easiest to ambush next fall after the conventions.

12 posted on 03/29/2007 7:08:15 AM PDT by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88

Oh, jeez, not another Buchanan-worshipping dolt.


13 posted on 03/29/2007 7:08:22 AM PDT by RockinRight (Support FREDeralism. Fred Thompson in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88

dumping on fred thompson because hes a threat to your guiliani i see.


19 posted on 03/29/2007 7:11:02 AM PDT by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88

"Neocon", like the terms "racist" or "sexist", has no meaning anymore beyond "I don't like what you're saying, but I'm too stupid to know how to argue with you about it".


21 posted on 03/29/2007 7:11:33 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (A member of the Frederalist Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88
AWESOME FACTS ABOUT FRED THOMPSON

* Fred Thompson has blasted more people in the face with a shotgun than even Dick Cheney.

* The masked executioner of Saddam Hussein: Fred Thompson.

* Every night before going to sleep, Osama bin Laden checks under his bed for Fred Thompson.

* Fred Thompson took over what was Al Gore's Senate seat, thereby dramatically reducing the Senate's carbon footprint. Fred Thompson then created carbon offset offsets by wastefully burning hippies.

* Fred Thompson reconsidered running for reelection after 9/11 but later decided to handle things on his own. He was soon seen entering the Middle East with a bottle of tequila in one hand an a handgun in the other. They're still counting the dead.

* Fred Thompson once ended a filibuster by ripping out a Senator's heart and showing it to him before he died.

* The actual cause of global warming: Fred Thompson's burning rage.

* Fred Thompson once stood on our south border and glared at Mexico. There was no illegal immigration for a month.

* Scientists predict that when Fred Thompson dies he'll explode taking out the five nearest planets before collapsing into a black hole.

* If you purchase a weather radio, it will wake you up with an alarm to warn you when Fred Thompson is pissed off.

* Webster's Dictionary defines "conservatism" as "how closely one's views resemble those of Fred Thompson."

* Fred Thompson's sense of strategy is so great that he can checkmate you using only a pawn and a knight.

* When terrorists get to the afterlife, they'll find that none of their seventy-two women are still virgins. Why? Because of Fred Thompson.

* Why does Iran want nuclear weapons? Out of fear of Fred Thompson.

29 posted on 03/29/2007 7:13:43 AM PDT by Vaquero (" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88
There already are two fine conservative candidates seeking the nomination: Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo. And Fred Thompson does not even come close measuring up to them. That's just idiotic, plain and simple. Fred Thompson's record speaks for itself, and his positives far, far outweigh any of his negatives.

And if we want to speak about negatives, then Ron Paul has to bear a lot of scrutinty. Ron Paul is part of the pro-surrender crowd. He basically has the foreign policy plans of a 6-year old girl who believes everything she sees when mommy watches CNN. Ron Paul, additionally, is a libertarian, not a conservative, which means he can't really be trusted on most of the social issues that count for anything, aside from gun control. How's he stand on the borders? Most libertarians tend to be open-borders supporters, or at least tend to waver on this issue, because their impulses impel them to believe that "individuals have the right to freely go where they can get the most compensation for their labour", regardless of pesky things like laws and national sovereignty.

Tom Tancredo, I like. But he would have zero chance of winning a national election, even if the Dims nominated Dennis "Space Cowboy" Kucinich, because he is widely perceived by the general population as being a wacko, and even by Republicans as being a one-hit wonder.

35 posted on 03/29/2007 7:17:53 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (A member of the Frederalist Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88

I don't listen to organizations that lump legal and illegal immigration policies into the same group.


36 posted on 03/29/2007 7:17:53 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Thompson/Watts in 2008!! Fear the Fred!! FreeRepublic is FRed country!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88

Thompson must be getting pretty popular, judging from the attacks I'm reading about today.


38 posted on 03/29/2007 7:18:45 AM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88
I was not impressed with how Thompson handled Chinagate.

Nuff said.

40 posted on 03/29/2007 7:21:08 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Grovelnator Schwarzenkaiser: Bringing fashionable fascism to Kaleeforia, one charade at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88

D; and on interior enforcement

Baf-d, bad.


42 posted on 03/29/2007 7:22:26 AM PDT by VU4G10 (Have You Forgotten?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meg88

Ron Paul? Really?


46 posted on 03/29/2007 7:23:40 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (The United States of America is the only country strong enough to go it alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson