Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Denounces Troop Withdrawal Deadline
WCBSTV ^ | March 27, 2007 | CBS/AP

Posted on 03/27/2007 7:25:09 PM PDT by FairOpinion

Republican presidential hopeful Rudolph Giuliani on Tuesday called the Democratic-controlled Congress' challenge to President Bush's policy in Iraq "a terrible mistake" and equated it with waving a white flag in the war against terrorism.

"I can't imagine in the history of war anybody announcing a timetable to run out and retreat," he said at an appearance at a delicatessen in this suburb just over the George Washington Bridge from New York City. "I think it's a terrible mistake. To put up the white flag and announce a timetable for retreat seems like a very bad strategy to me."

Giuliani's remarks came on the heels of the U.S. Senate narrowly passing a nonbinding timeline that would have U.S. combat troops home by next March. President Bush is likely to veto the resolution.

"I hope that the president vetoes it," Giuliani said. "The full focus of our energies should be on supporting the troops that are there and trying to act against terrorism, trying to create an Iraq that acts as a bulwark against terrorism instead of a headquarters for terrorism."

He also didn't mince words when asked what he would do as president if Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad continued to flirt with developing nuclear weapons.

"What I would do is make clear to him that he's not going to have nuclear weapons. That's not an option. Containment may have worked with the Soviets, but as far as I can recall, the Soviets weren't planning to come here and kill us. They didn't blow up the World Trade Center twice. We've got a different kind of enemy here. Ahmadinejad has to be clear that we're not going to let him move to the stage where he can have nuclear weapons."

(Excerpt) Read more at wcbstv.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: congress; democrats; electionpresident; elections; giuliani; iran; iraq; iraqtimeline; rudy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 last
To: dmw

Dissing him for cause. Why don't you go back and read the posts in order -- with an open mind, if that's possible.

Why should anyone be exempt?


181 posted on 03/28/2007 8:59:09 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: dmw

How do I know he's not a troll?

As for vets, Kerry is a vet. Is he exempt too?


182 posted on 03/28/2007 9:00:40 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: dmw

What was so awful about 167?


183 posted on 03/28/2007 9:01:23 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: airborne

Pings aren't necessary. When you log on, you have the option of going to new messages.


184 posted on 03/28/2007 9:02:27 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot

I made a mistake and cleared it up with the moderator. It is your ugly disgusting post #157. You are classless. But again, you already know that.


185 posted on 03/28/2007 9:10:26 PM PDT by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: dmw

When people are attacked, they respond in kind, and I'm no exception. I may have gone too far with that post. But I don't start these things.


186 posted on 03/28/2007 10:51:37 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
It isn't required to ping someone you're talking about.

It is, however, a long time courtesy here on FreeRepublic to ping the person you are talking about, to give that person the opportunity to respond to your comment.

Especially if it's an attack on that person, as yours was on me.

It's up to the individual poster to be courteous or not.

187 posted on 03/29/2007 4:08:23 AM PDT by airborne (Airborne! Ranger! Combat Tested Vietnam Veteran! DUNCAN HUNTER !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson