Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel Snubs Condoleezza Rice
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 3-27-2007 | Tim Butcher

Posted on 03/27/2007 10:56:15 AM PDT by blam

Israel snubs Condoleezza Rice

By Tim Butcher in Jerusalem
Last Updated: 3:01pm BST 27/03/2007

Condoleezza Rice received a humiliating snub from Israel yesterday when it refused her offer to act as negotiator between its government and the Palestinian authorities.

Miss Rice met with Mr Olmert in an effort to revive Middle East peace hopes

The American Secretary of State, who was attempting to kick-start final status talks on the creation of a Palestinian state during a visit to Jerusalem, was forced to postpone a press conference planned on Monday evening after tense discussions with the Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert.

With Israel refusing to give in, Miss Rice was forced to head back to Washington unable to announce any major breakthrough on the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian question.

America had hoped to be able to cite progress in the Middle East peace process as a counterweight to its regional unpopularity arising out of its troubled occupation of Iraq.

The problem from Israel’s point of view is that final status talks cannot begin while the current Palestinian unity government fails to meet international conditions of renouncing violence, recognising Israel and accepting all existing Israeli-Palestinian agreements.

The unity government contains independent ministers and others affiliated with Fatah, a movement Israel does negotiate with, but the fact that it is dominated by representatives of the Islaimist movement Hamas means it fails to meet the three conditions.

“These conditions are not Israeli conditions, but international conditions demanded by the international community,” said Miri Eisin, a spokesman for Mr Olmert. “Israel has made clear that when the conditions have been met, then Israel is willing to enter into full negotiations.”

When asked about Miss Rice’s offer to act as interlocutor, she said: “That was just one idea.

“Secretary of State Rice came with many diverse ideas and we are grateful for her direct involvement which is very positive and gives added momentum.”

Miss Rice read a prepared statement yesterday - 12 hours after the planned press conference was meant to be held - in which she sought to put the most positive spin her latest visit to the region, the fourth in the last four months.

She said Mr Olmert and Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian National Authority, had agreed to meet fortnightly to discuss day-to-day matters although she conceded final status talks were some way from starting.

“As I’ve noted before, we’re not yet at final status negotiations,” she said.

“These are initial discussions to build confidence between the parties.”

Mr Olmert already meets regularly with Mr Abbas. But the Israeli prime minister has had some harsh words for the Palestinian leader, accusing him of “breaking promises” over the creation of the new unity government.

Mr Olmert’s office said Mr Abbas had committed himself repeatedly to not forming a unity government until Gilad Shalit, the Israeli corporal captured by Palestinian militants last June, was released.

Israel is angry the unity government has been formed without Cpl Shalit’s release, in breach of Mr Abbas’s undertaking.

The focus of the Middle East peace process shifts to Saudi Arabia tomorrow, where the Arab League is due to meet with Israel-Palestine at the top of the agenda.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: condi; condoleezza; israel; rice

1 posted on 03/27/2007 10:56:16 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

I hope it's true, but I don't trust the British press.


2 posted on 03/27/2007 10:57:08 AM PDT by Stepan12 ( "We are all girlymen now." Conservative reaction to Ann Coulter's anti PC joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Hmm.. she is surprised?


3 posted on 03/27/2007 10:59:11 AM PDT by APRPEH (Hillary probably wouldn't approve, but I can live with that....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

President Bush and Dr, Rice keep pushing for a Palestinian State. These people arent ready for a State. Right now its a Welfare State. If all the aid going in there were cut off they would all starve. They were give greenhouses and established business for them when Israel moved out, They destroyed them. All they wish to do is mirder kill and kidnap. A State ???> They dont need a State, they need a tyrannical ruler that can control them with an iron fist.
Its all they understand.


4 posted on 03/27/2007 11:02:42 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
America had hoped to be able to cite progress in the Middle East peace process as a counterweight to its regional unpopularity

Yeah right, as if "citing progess" will win Muslim "hearts and minds." The U.S. will never be popular with the Muslim world, and the sooner this (and every other) administration figures that out, the better. But we can be respected and feared if the appropriate action is taken. Still waiting.....

5 posted on 03/27/2007 11:03:33 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Condoleezza Rice received a humiliating snub from Israel yesterday when it refused her offer to act as negotiator between its government and the Palestinian authorities.

That's good snubbin'.

Regards.

6 posted on 03/27/2007 11:04:59 AM PDT by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The problem from Israel’s point of view is that final status talks cannot begin while the current Palestinian unity government fails to meet international conditions of renouncing violence, recognising Israel and accepting all existing Israeli-Palestinian agreements.

A reasonable point of view, obviously. Conversely, the Bush admin's view that Israel should sign a deal with a terrorist-led group of squatters who've failed to abide by any conditions of the President's so-called "road map to peace" is most unreasonable.

7 posted on 03/27/2007 11:14:43 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I have been a little disappointed in Condi lately. I really really like her and don't want to criticize her too harshly, but some of the things she's been saying lately--where is it coming from? Is she just doing her job and bidding of GW and others? The fact is that Hamas is really running the Palestinian show right now and they pretty much want nothing but the destruction of Israel--not a return to the 1967 borders. Fatah, for all its bastardry, is a secular organization (that has had to incorporate it's own fair share of radical Islamist views). But they are corrupt, inept, and if they see some kind of a deal are buyable--they'd sell their mother for the right price. Not with Hamas. So why would Israel (except for the doves) want to get involved in any kind of peace negotiations at this time. In reality, I think we'd be better off putting Palestinians on the shelf for a good while. All the bloviating by our gov't is just to keep our own left wing slightly happy and hopefully fractionally less critical (as if it really mattered).


8 posted on 03/27/2007 11:28:43 AM PDT by brooklyn dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brooklyn dave
"a little disappointed in Condi lately"...jeez, I find her absolutely ridiculous. She deserves a lot more than a snub after this idiotic capitulation to the Terrorist and the Arab enablers. GWB + Tonto/Rice have given up and just trying to work the old diplo-lying routine till they can get out of office.
9 posted on 03/27/2007 12:19:34 PM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam
Israel Snubs Condoleezza Rice

About time. They should have sent every Sec of State since Kissinger a packing. Especially the ones who insist they bow to the Palestian threats and acts.

10 posted on 03/27/2007 7:01:42 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Kool Aid! The popular American favorite drink now Made In Mexico. Pro-Open Borders? Drink Up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Good!


11 posted on 03/27/2007 7:02:59 PM PDT by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NY Attitude

Condi '08.......hehehe...remember that line?


12 posted on 03/27/2007 8:47:37 PM PDT by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chasio649

Hopefully that will not be a reality.


13 posted on 03/27/2007 9:07:10 PM PDT by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
These people arent ready for a State.

Exactly. Condi is just paying lip service to all these proposals until Olmert is gone. One of the "conditions" she and Bush consistently insist on is "recognition of Israel" and "renunciation of violence" before anything else is even discussed. No pressure on Israel from our side to give up any "land for peace", unlike Clinton making Israel give up more and more land at the signs of more and more "intifada".

Keeps everybody ticked off at "Palestinians" / Hamas, what can be better? They've already shown in Gaza that they can't live with each other, let alone Israel - a "grand experiment", a great showcase.

Keep playing, keep them "talking" until Israel will get someone (Bibi?) who is going to make sure she'll be ready for Hamas, Hizbollah, and Iran.

14 posted on 03/28/2007 3:06:56 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
The problem from Israel’s point of view is that final status talks cannot begin while the current Palestinian unity government fails to meet international conditions of renouncing violence, recognising Israel and accepting all existing Israeli-Palestinian agreements. ==================== That the U.S. would consider negotiations while these conditions are not met is disgraceful. Israel shouldn't budge one fraction of an inch from their present stand. It's time the U.S. and the world community to stop playing these games at Israel's expense. It's time to hold the Palestinians responsible for decades of terror and international game playing. Tell the Arab leaders to shove it until they start demanding Palestinian leaders act in the interest of their people and in the interest of peace with their neighbors. Arab leaders need to be ignored until resolution 242 is honored by all parties involved.
15 posted on 03/28/2007 6:12:16 PM PDT by Joan Kerrey (Believe nothing of what you hear or read and half of what you see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson