You must have noticed it is not X I am talking about. It's A thru W. That is Rudy's albatross. Defend him if you like.
If Bill Gates is a bad example, there are many libs running corporations and investment houses that meet the criteria.
Hunter needs little defending. But there are very few articles to post on him, since he isn't one of the big three...yet. I've posted dozens of articles that I could find.
And I'm not attacking Rudy supporters, I'm cutting Rudy off at the knees. If you feel guilt by association, sorry. LOL
Only by including a whole host of things that political conservatives don't care about . . .
Typically, "political conservatives" only look to the specific things required for a Prez to do a good job of the day-to-day management of the country. Spending. Taxes. Defense. Local v. Federal control. Accountability. Good management.
The things govt has proven are the big problems with govt.
These 'political conservatives' were the basis of the two big landslides in recent history . . . Reagan and the Contract with America.
Hunter needs *selling*. He has significant weaknesses to us. A lack of executive experience being most important. Y'see, to me, voting for prez is a 'hiring' decision. The first, biggest deal-breaker is a lack of experience.
I'd like to humbly suggest that Newt has the best combination of skills and experience available . . . altho he comes with vice baggage the Social Cs may not care for.