Posted on 03/26/2007 1:25:49 PM PDT by NYC Republican
Keep reading. It's the next section down that Boortz is talking about.
It's also worth noting that irreligious zealots ... not religious zealots ... were responsible for the great bloodbaths and totalitarian assaults on freedom in the twentieth century.
Not even sure if that quote is genuine, as I've heard it elsewhere a few times, but I still like it. ;-)
The dispute over the geocentric (earth-centered) vs. heliocentric (sun-centered) solar system took much longer to resolve, and the irony was that the geocentric theory was actually "correct" based on the science as it was understood at the time (not religion). Technically, the scientific community never really proved the heliocentric nature of the solar system until the first successful measurements of a phenomenon called "stellar parallax" (the movement of stars in relation to each other as the earth moves from one point in its orbit to a point 180 degrees away in six months) were made by Friedrich Bessel in 1838.
Extremism and conservatism are mutually exclusive concepts. Some various types of extremists make regular appearances here on FR, and are immediately obvious. But they love to take on the mantra of "conservative" in spite of the incongruity of the two. The MSM is a willing co-conspirator because it is then easy to link these "conservatives" with Republicans. But in fact conservatives reject extremism whether it is from the RR or any other faction that repudiates rationality and reasonableness.
You mean the earth doesn't revolve around ME!?!?
They have that right. But it certainly makes their positions worthy of ridicule.
Is he wrong? Is the Earth really flat? Is it wrong to mock those who think the Earth is flat or to point out their mistake?
But I'd bet that for every self-identified conservative who believes that modern humans and dinosaurs were on Earth at the same time, there's probably two self-identified liberals who believe the moon landings were a hoax and that 9/11 was an inside job, so both sides can certainly play this game.
No silly. It revolves and evolves around Obama this week.
Well, give me time. I'm still getting used to this idea that the Earth revolves around the Sun. :-))
Wow, it does say that. I never noticed it before. That obviously didn't happen, so we best pitch the whole book. < /sarcasm>
It has been addressed - read the articles. If you have an intelligent critique, I'd be glad to hear it. If all you have are insults, rude insinuations, and the heroic slaying of straw men, don't waste my time.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i3/longday.asp
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/geocentrism.asp
LOL...
Barry Goldwater
Not to my knowledge. But he was a former Democrat.
Most of what passes for "science education" these days isn't really educational at all. And I'm not even talking about the encroachment of politics into scientific fields . . . I'm referring to the lack of a basic understanding of the scientific method that seems to be commonplace in education these days.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.