"It should present itself as a "fair and unbiased" alternative to Wikipedia."
I agree -- maybe there is room for a THIRD Wikipadia. FoxNews shoudl sponsor it.
FAIRIPEDIA.
Conservapedia has correct complaints, but then decided to make a very narrow-minded creationist version ... that is almost a parody of what conservatives believe, I'd almost think that is a Steven Colbert parody.
FairOpinion ... There is a gentleman I know who has seen the problem as you do and has the website reserved:
americapedia.org - The American Online Encylcopedia would be a 'fair and balanced' encyclopedia that eliminates wikipedia's bias issues, eliminates kid-unfriendly material, and allows/encourages wider POV articles (that are marked ax such) and more reliable sources. Wikipedia has a POV that pretends its not.
Anyone want to join up with that?