Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Weight of Glory

From the article :

"Yesterday, the former First Sea Lord, Admiral Sir Alan West, said British rules of engagement were “very much de-escalatory, because we don’t want wars starting … Rather than roaring into action and sinking everything in sight we try to step back and that, of course, is why our chaps were, in effect, able to be captured and taken away.”

Ahem. 'De-escalatory' ? Sooo... when they come to kill you in your own house will you try to 'de-escalate' by killing yourself ? What the hell in the world are these people smoking. Someone even gets close enough to try to board you *do* sink everything in sight and ask questions later.


2 posted on 03/25/2007 5:35:18 PM PDT by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: farlander
It just goes to show you that all this is related to knives having pointy parts on the end. Once they get the sharp points off the end of chef knives and the like, everything will be all better.
3 posted on 03/25/2007 5:37:01 PM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

" Ahem. 'De-escalatory' "

Yeah! It does seem as though the Brits know of a mysterious land where they acquire all the "squishy" words they use.


7 posted on 03/25/2007 5:38:11 PM PDT by Weight of Glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
Yesterday, the former First Sea Lord, Admiral Sir Alan West, said British rules of engagement were “very much de-escalatory, because we don’t want wars starting"

Memo to the Brits: The war has already started.

9 posted on 03/25/2007 5:38:44 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
Yesterday, the former First Sea Lord, Admiral Sir Alan West, said British rules of engagement were “very much de-escalatory, because we don’t want wars starting … Rather than roaring into action and sinking everything in sight we try to step back and that, of course, is why our chaps were, in effect, able to be captured and taken away.”

If British ROE were more appropriate, they wouldn't come looking for you chumps er... chaps.

20 posted on 03/25/2007 5:45:14 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
""Yesterday, the former First Sea Lord, Admiral Sir Alan West, said British rules of engagement were “very much de-escalatory, because we don’t want wars starting …"

The Europeans have gone sissy, even the once proud Brits. "De-escalatory"? "Don't want wars starting"? Note to Admiral West, you are already in a war. Not fighting back after you're already in a war is an act of cowardice, no matter how many words like "de-escalatory" you may invent.

24 posted on 03/25/2007 5:47:27 PM PDT by Cooking101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
former First Sea Lord, Admiral Sir Alan West, said British rules of engagement were “very much de-escalatory, because we don’t want wars starting … Rather than roaring into action and sinking everything in sight we try to step back and that, of course, is why our chaps were, in effect, able to be captured and taken away.”

Sounds like ROE more appropriate for when passing through trusted allied waters...

26 posted on 03/25/2007 5:52:50 PM PDT by M203M4 (The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

It was a British Admiral said that moderation in warfare is the height of folly.

I suppose that's why they didn't take U.S. sailors hostage.


28 posted on 03/25/2007 5:53:31 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (When I search out the massed wheeling circles of the stars, my feet no longer touch the earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
Rather than roaring into action and sinking everything in sight we try to step back and that, of course, is why our chaps were, in effect, able to be captured and taken away.”

Lord Nelson is rolling over in his grave.

36 posted on 03/25/2007 5:58:40 PM PDT by A message (Liberalism does not breed survivors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
"Yesterday, the former First Sea Lord, Admiral Sir Alan West, said British rules of engagement were “very much de-escalatory, because we don’t want wars starting..."

Ronald Reagan said something to the effect of "America's been in four wars during my lifetime and none of them were started because the enemy thought we were too strong."

39 posted on 03/25/2007 6:02:51 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (Liberals are willing to sacrifice any amount of someone else's money to increase their own power...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
very much de-escalatory, because we don’t want wars starting...

When the school bully knows you won't fight back, you'll be handing him your lunch money every day.

57 posted on 03/25/2007 6:22:55 PM PDT by Wheee The People (Go FRed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
… Rather than roaring into action and sinking everything in sight we try to step back and that, of course, is why our chaps were, in effect, able to be captured and taken away.”

Come on you Limies! You'd never have hung on to the Colonies with an attitude like that... Oh, you lost your colonies didn't you. Well, you're sure as hell not going to survive as a nation if you keep this BS up.

Come on! We need you as an Allie.

58 posted on 03/25/2007 6:23:35 PM PDT by Barnacle (Free Republic, The First Amendment at work protecting the others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
Ahem. 'De-escalatory' ? Sooo... when they come to kill you in your own house will you try to 'de-escalate' by killing yourself ?

Yes.

It would seem to the Brits self defense is considered as great, if not greater, crime than murder.

I recall reading about an older gentleman who was arrested and charged under some foolish law for defending himself WITH A WALKING STICK from a pair who had broken into his home.

So yes, it would seem the British have a suicidal streak.
78 posted on 03/25/2007 6:54:20 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander; blackie
British rules of engagement ...?

.

90 posted on 03/25/2007 7:32:40 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

So now will the Brits call in Carter and have him negotiate for months for the release of the Brit captives and when that fails will Britain then do a nationwide ankle grab and cave to all the imans demands?


113 posted on 03/25/2007 8:54:29 PM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

I wonder what Nelson would have thought of Admiral West's ROEs? Napoleon would have LOVED them! - for the Royal Navy.


116 posted on 03/25/2007 9:22:58 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

IMHO, I prefer another form of de-esculation, wherein one applies American 'cowboy' tactics of shooting the other sorry bastard before he has a chance to further escalate the situation.


138 posted on 03/26/2007 4:23:11 AM PDT by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

brit leaders are morons, morons, morons, morons, morons

rules of engagement for warfare are to fight, not surrender you morons, morons, morons, morons, morons

politicians fighting wars is bad karma


143 posted on 03/26/2007 5:30:51 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom (now is the time to kill their leaders with extreme prejudice and plant the seeds of a hopeful spring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

Sinking the whole Iranian Navy might prevent this from happening again in the forseeable future.


151 posted on 03/26/2007 5:41:59 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
They need to retire this guy - quick!

I'm glad to know the USN had a reasonable ROE for this situation.

The UK ought to issue an issue an ultimatum: give us our sailors and marines back or we, and all of NATO, declare war.
157 posted on 03/26/2007 6:24:06 AM PDT by Little Ray (Proud to be one of "...the most paranoid, xenophobic and reactionary characters...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson