Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldFriend; Grampa Dave

I thought that the Cole did not have permission to fire their weapons in port and that their guns were not loaded.

My recollection ( could be wrong ) is that the DOD had given orders to the Captain to not post armed guards in port. Also that the Captain was not aware of the attack until after the explosion.

Please help me if I am wrong.




186 posted on 03/26/2007 2:11:19 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: george76

The crew of the Cole were basically unarmed thanks to the Clintoons and the Goron.

Now we have President Bush, and things have changed.

However, most of us, who served in the Cold War in potentially hot areas, know that we often had PC ROEs, that placed us in danger if the commies decided to take us out or make an issue of us. It has been a problem since the Korean War, thanks to Truman and the UN.


187 posted on 03/26/2007 2:34:13 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (GW has more Honor and Integrity in his little finger than ALL of the losers on the "hate Bush" band)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

To: george76

The Cole incident never would have happened had the Clinton administration not denied UNREPS and left the Cole to replenish in a foreign port.


191 posted on 03/26/2007 7:56:39 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson