Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/25/2007 8:12:53 AM PDT by Ellesu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ellesu

A bunch of poppy cock.

Where "poverty" is greatest and "social" services the least, the "poor" remain because they are survivors.

I will put the "poor" of Africa, Indonesia and southern India far ahead of the pampered "poor" in places in the "developed" world like a New Orleans.

The liberal plantation society does not breed survivors.


2 posted on 03/25/2007 8:20:08 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

"A recent study by the World Health Organisation and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine says global warming may already be responsible for more than 160,000 deaths a year from malaria and malnutrition. The authors estimate that this number could double by 2020."
________________________________________________________


Be wary and resist of anything presented by the WHO. They are trying to brainwash the children and ruin our culture in the interest of globalization.


7 posted on 03/25/2007 8:35:29 AM PDT by Kryn-Man (Self-righteous, gun-totin', military-lovin', redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu
In Australia, by factoring equity issues into our planning, we are at the very least able to enshrine mechanisms to ensure that our most disadvantaged citizens are protected from some of the most likely immediate impacts and not shut out of opportunities that will arise in the shift to a green economy. This will inevitably involve trade-offs between environmental concerns, business efficiency, social equity and macro-economic costs.

Where do people who talk this pompous way come from?

Can we put them on an island someplace where they can talk to each other all day and leave the rest of us alone?

Countries with poor democratic structures, weak borders and high incidence of corruption are most vulnerable to the potential for climate change triggering large-scale humanitarian crisis. Countries with poor democratic structures, weak borders and high incidence of corruption are most vulnerable to the potential for climate change triggering large-scale humanitarian crisis. This has serious long-term implications, not only for the people affected in these regions, but also for more affluent Western countries in terms of preparedness to direct aid dollars to those areas worst affected.

Why would anyone send money to save corrupt dictators governing masses of stupid, lazy and ignorant people?

This global warming nonsense is just a back door argument for world socialism.

And the answer is still "No!"

8 posted on 03/25/2007 8:35:36 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

Weather patterns are going to change over time no matter what we, as humans, decide to do. In just about every statement, money comes into play. We will always have the poor, not matter what we do or how much money we give them. It's always been this way and will remain this way. Africa has been a starving area of the world for over 100 years and it's because they won't, or can't, do anything to change it.


9 posted on 03/25/2007 8:35:52 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

What a bunch of hooey! This is right out of the nineteenth century.


12 posted on 03/25/2007 9:04:08 AM PDT by RightWhale (Treaty rules;commerce droolz; Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu
A recent study by the World Health Organisation and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine says global warming Rachel Carson may already be responsible for more than 160,000 deaths a year from malaria and malnutrition. The authors estimate that this number could double by 2020.

There! Fixed it!
Let's give credit where credit is due.

Good 'ol Rachel

13 posted on 03/25/2007 9:08:26 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

To have a more or less neutral carbon foot print would mean going back to life in about 1900 where few had cars and most people walked or took bicycles or public street cars, electric lights and appliances were rare and running water and flush toilets were luxuries.


14 posted on 03/25/2007 9:14:24 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

There you have it.....


15 posted on 03/25/2007 9:40:51 AM PDT by Dallas59 (AL GORE STALKED ME ON 2/25/2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

Puh-lease!! Always remember to attach "BARF ALERT" to socialist, anti-capitalism drivel.


19 posted on 03/25/2007 10:54:05 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu
A recent study by the World Health Organisation and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine says global warming may already be responsible for more than 160,000 deaths a year from malaria and malnutrition.

You know what's good for malaria? DDT, but you stupid enviro-freaks banned it to save the baby birds!

20 posted on 03/25/2007 11:00:38 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson