[Peach]

But Rosenberg, the evangelical novelist, is not so sure. "With [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad's nuclear weapons program, a lot of evangelicals are going to have to say, 'Look — we need somebody who can defend Judeo-Christian civilization,' " Rosenberg said. "If the election comes down to Giuliani against Hillary [Clinton], the evangelical base … will have to ask who they want sitting in the chair if we go to war with a nuclear Iran." For many evangelicals, that question could deem Giuliani not just the lesser of two evils but a national savior.

It seems like a lot of evangelicals are thinking quite differently than the ragers on Free Republic.

[KATIE-O]

It seems like a lot of evangelicals are thinking quite differently than the ragers on Free Republic.





Thank goodness! A lot is at stake in this next election. If the nutball in Tehran is still posturing, the Evangelicals will vote for whoever follows Bush's stance on national security. Rudy will poll very well in that area.

[CharlesWayneCT]

The evangelical said we would have to ask the question. It was the writer who claimed we'd see Giuliani as a savior.

Fortunately, we have a long time before we get stuck with such a Hobson's choice.