To: kabar
Gee I am so sorry you find the concept of the President as Commander in Chief so difficult to comprehend. The President has utterly no legal need to consult Congress on this at all. Try reading Article 2 Section 2 of the US Constitution. The Dims cannot even get the votes for their stupid Iraq "non binding: Iraq resolution in the US Senate. You think they have the votes to cut off funding to active operations? Dream on.
386 posted on
03/25/2007 10:13:00 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(If you will try being smarter, I will try being nicer.)
To: MNJohnnie
Gee I am so sorry you find the concept of the President as Commander in Chief so difficult to comprehend. The President has utterly no legal need to consult Congress on this at all. Try reading Article 2 Section 2 of the US Constitution. The Dims cannot even get the votes for their stupid Iraq "non binding: Iraq resolution in the US Senate. You think they have the votes to cut off funding to active operations? Dream on.You seem to be missing the Dem strategy. They are not cutting off funds for active operations. They are just adding some conditions to their use. The House supplemental bill approves the funding.
If you want to understand the Dem strategy, David Obey is explaining how it will work.
415 posted on
03/25/2007 10:37:43 AM PDT by
kabar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson