Replies

Never forget: Russert filed a false affidavit in theLibby case, and he did so with the knowledge of Fitzy. Furthermore, Russert out and out lied on the stand when he said he didn't know you couldn't have a lawyer in with you if testifying before a grand jury. Russert is a flat out liar, he should be shunned and never watched.

On another note, I watched (watching) Reliable Sources. The panel was discussing the news media's coverage of the Gonzales "situation". Howie ended by saying based on the coverage he has seen, it is clear to everyone that the correspondents and pundits are all siding with the democrats, and that is how the american people see it. (He must have done some polling, because on that score he is absolutely correct). Unfortunately, Howie doesn't really see it as the constant that it is: media side with the democrats all the time. They are lefties, each and everyone of them, including Howie.

The fact that most dems lie is hardly even newsworthy, the fact that they can get away with it during a grand jury proceedings should really be a wake up call.

IMHO I still don't understand why the Adm. has responded to any questions whatsoever about the firing of the 8 U.S. attorneys. It was always GW's right to do so and why answer any questions at all when you already know how the answers will be used.

For these people to finally to see the horrible slant, it must be way over the top.

What is needed is for people on our side to get in these jagdorks faces and call them on their bias and refusal to cover stories right in front of them. Here are a few festering sores for starters:

1. Rahm Emanuel: Using the now convicted Chicago Machine player Tomczaks Water Department "workers" to help him closeout his first primary win for Congress

2. Harry Reid's land deals and connection to Jack Abramoff

3. Covering the case where Baghdad Jim McDermott has been ordered to pay 700K in damages and costs to Jim Boehmer for his role in leaking the "accidental wiretap" of his phone conversations with then Speaker Gingrich. Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't it seem in this case that Democrats support electronic eavesdropping. However, if this process is used to enhance National Security they are against it.

4. I can go on and on but, what use is it? These republipussies will continue to cower and be portrayed as clueless idiots.