Posted on 03/24/2007 5:21:18 AM PDT by radar101
The capture of British Navy servicemen by Iranian forces is not simply an incident over sea sovereignty in the Persian Gulf. It is a calculated move on behalf of Teherans Jihadi chess players to provoke a projected counter move by London and its American allies. It is all happening in a regional context, carefully engineered by the Mullahs strategic planners. Here is how: The Iranian regimes master plan is to wait out the remainder of Tony Blairs mandate (few more months) and the remaining real time of President Bush (till about the end of 2007). For the thinking process in Tehran, based on their Western consultants, believe that Washington and London have reached the end of the rope and will only have till 2008 to do something major to destabilize Ahmedinijad regime. As explained by a notorious propagandist on al Jazeera today the move is precisely to respond to the Anglo-American attempt to stir trouble inside Iran. Anis Naccash, a Lebanese intellectual supporter of the Ayatollahs regime, appearing from Tehran few hours ago on the Qatari-based satellite and explained that the US and the UK must understand that Iran is as much at war with these two powers in as much as they support the rise of movements and security instability inside Iran. He added that Khamenei is clear on the regimes decision to strike: we will be at war with you on all levels: secret, diplomatic, military and other. Pro-Iranian propagandists in the region, via media and online rushed to warn that this movement is part of Irans counter-strike against any attempt to destabilize the regime. Two major tracks emerge from these statements, the Iranian military maneuvers and the capture of British Navy personnel.
1) Irans domestic front is putting pressure on the Ahmedinijad regime.
From internal reporting, dissidents and anti-Ahmedinijad forces from various social sectors are practically in slow motion eruption against the authorities. Students, women, workers and political activists have been demonstrating and sometimes clashing with the regimes security apparatus. Western media didnt report proportionally on these events over the past few weeks. In addition, ethnic minority areas have been witnessing several incidents, including violence against the Revolutionary Guards, including in the Arab and Baluch areas. And last but not least, the defection of a major intelligence-military figure early this month to the West was, according to internal sources, a massive loss to the regime and a possible first one in a series.
2) The regime need an external clash to crush the domestic challenge.
As in many comparable cases worldwide, when an authoritarian regime is faced with severe internal opposition it attempts to deflect the crisis onto the outside world. Hence, Teherans all out campaign against the US and its allies in Iraq, Lebanon and the region is in fact a repositioning of Irans shield against the expected rising opposition inside the country. Hence the Khomeinist Mullahs plan seem to be projected as follow:
a. Engage in the diplomatic realm, to project a realist approach worldwide, but refrain from offering real results
b. Continue, along with the Syrian regime, in supporting the Jihadi Terror operations (including sectarian ones) inside Iraq
c. Widen the propaganda campaign against the US and its allies via a number of PR companies within the West, to portray Iran as a victim of an upcoming war provoked by the US.
d. Engage in skirmishes in the Gulf (and possibly in other spots) with US and British elements claiming these action as defensive, while planned thoroughly ahead of time.
3) The regime plan is to drag its opponents into a trap
Teherans master planners intend to drag the Coalition into steps in engagement, at the timing of and in the field of control of Irans apparatus. Multiple options and scenarios are projected.
a. British military counter measure takes place, supported by the US. Irans regime believe that only limited action by the allies is possible, according to their analysis of the domestic constraints inside the two powerful democracies.
b. Tehran moves to a second wave of activities, at its own pace, hoping to draw a higher level of classical counter strikes by US and UK forces. The dosing by Irans leadership is expected to stretch the game in time, until the departure of Blair and of the Bush Administration by its political opponents inside the countrys institutions and public debate.
In a short conclusion the War room in Tehran has engaged itself in an alley of tactical moves it feels it can control. But the Iranian regime, with all its political chess expertise, may find itself in a precarious and risky situation. For while it feel that it can control the tactical battlefield in the region and fuel the propaganda pressure inside the West with its Petro-dollars, it may not be able to contain the internal forces in Iran, because of which it has decided to go on offense.
The Ahmedinijad regime wishes to crumble the international consensus to avoid the financial sanctions: that is true. But as important, if not more, it wants to be able to crush the revolt before it pounds the doors to the Mullahs palaces.
Dr Walid Phares is a Senior Fellow with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies in Washington
Iran under pressure to free sailors
The Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary have piled the pressure on Iran to demand the immediate release of 15 British service personnel held captive for five days.
Diplomatic wrangling intensified, with Tony Blair saying he was "utterly confident" they had done nothing wrong while Margaret Beckett demanded their safe return in "very robust" terms.
The group of sailors and marines seized last Friday include married mother-of-one Faye Turney and 21-year-old Paul Barton.
In an interview with the BBC, hours before she was captured, Mrs Turney said: "My parents made sure that I was under no illusion that I could and can go to war at any time. That's the choice I made, so it's always there.
"You've got to have it in the back of your head that you can be called on - and when you do you've just got to deal with it and get on with it."
All 15 British personnel were detained at gun-point after they boarded a dhow carrying suspicious cargo off the coast of Iraq.
The Foreign Office has maintained pressure on the Iranian government and Mrs Beckett spoke to her counterpart Manouchehr Mottaki for the second time since the affair began.
A Foreign Office spokesman said: "She spoke in very robust terms, re-iterating the UK's concerns about the continued detention of our personnel. She demanded their safe and speedy return and immediate consular access so that we can satisfy ourselves that they are safe and well."
Mum held!
http://news.uk.msn.com/Article.aspx?cp-documentid=4552406
Earlier, Mr Blair warned of a "different phase" if diplomatic efforts failed to secure their release.
The Prime Minister's spokesman said he was referring to "a different way" of handling talks, which may involve making public the reasons why the UK was certain the personnel were in Iraqi waters.
Hell Yeah! WW1, 1917 to 1919 & WW2, 1942 to 1946......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.