Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Royal Navy Incident: Iran?s larger trap
Political Mavens ^ | 24 MARCH 2007 | Walid Phares

Posted on 03/24/2007 5:21:18 AM PDT by radar101

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2007 5:21:19 AM PDT by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: radar101

I cannot imagine how these sailors or marines allowed themselves to be captured. I'd have gone down fighting.


2 posted on 03/24/2007 5:28:39 AM PDT by SoldierMedic (Rowan Walter, 23 Feb 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

I wonder if the British will back down to the crazy in the middle east and call it peace in our time. I saw on tv this morning they are taking the hostages to Iran to talk to them. Does that mean a nasty beaten confession on tv? How long will the free world stand for these nutcases insulting our countries?Another case of in your face from radical Islam again.


3 posted on 03/24/2007 5:28:52 AM PDT by betsyross1776 (BIG HOME DO NOT BUY YOU HAPPINESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

With the full sopport of the DNC and Pelosi, I'm sure!


4 posted on 03/24/2007 5:35:10 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoldierMedic

15 sailors with small arms on routine inspection duty in two inflatable boats VS patrol boats with mounted weapons? The sailors had no option.


5 posted on 03/24/2007 5:36:08 AM PDT by MediaMole (9/11 - We have already forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: radar101

"The regime “need” an external clash to crush the domestic challenge."

That's exactly how they operate. They've done this time and time again.


6 posted on 03/24/2007 5:37:00 AM PDT by nuconvert ([there are bad people in the pistachio business] (...but his head is so tiny...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: betsyross1776

It is a new day. Welcome to socialism "lite" in America...I mean MexAmeriCanada. This is not the US of old. We will not pressure Britain.


7 posted on 03/24/2007 5:39:11 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Walid Phares, pong


8 posted on 03/24/2007 5:39:48 AM PDT by nuconvert ([there are bad people in the pistachio business] (...but his head is so tiny...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

If the Brits and U.S. do strike iran over this, it won't be proportional. They'll be going after nutjob and all his people around the world at one time.


9 posted on 03/24/2007 5:40:57 AM PDT by gotribe ( I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution... - Grover Cleveland.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Chess, American style: Draw gun and kill your opponent.

Game over.


10 posted on 03/24/2007 5:41:34 AM PDT by aculeus (Ceci n'est pas une tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
15 sailors with small arms on routine inspection duty in two inflatable boats VS patrol boats with mounted weapons? The sailors had no option.

Nonsense. They should have attempted to leave and when the Iranians tried to prevent them, should have opened fire and gunned the boats while radioing for for help from American and British naval and air forces. Our forces should have scrambled aircraft and given the Iranians an ultimatum: release the sailors or be sunk. And then sunk them if they hesitated. No one wants sailors or soldiers killed, but 15 men are not worth the loss of national credibility. Ever.

Had the Spartans taken the easy way out, we'd all be speaking Persian and bowing to Ahuramazda.

11 posted on 03/24/2007 5:46:25 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoldierMedic

The Brits were in a small rubber boat with an outboard motor. The Iranians had much larger craft with deck mounted guns. No contest.


12 posted on 03/24/2007 5:47:21 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Iran is playing a very dangerous game. Their pathetic chest thumping is going to get their sorry asses monkey stomped into a pile of goo. Mark my words.


13 posted on 03/24/2007 5:53:30 AM PDT by stm (Believe 1% of what you hear in the drive-by media and take half of that with a grain of salt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

15 sailors with small arms on routine inspection duty in two inflatable boats VS patrol boats with mounted weapons? The sailors had no option

Granted your point is valid, but where was their back up? No air cover or bigger ships?


14 posted on 03/24/2007 5:53:55 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gotribe

Well, we do have two carriers in the area now. I suggest we take out their navy - every last ship. Don't leave them anything larger than a rowboat. You can't exhibit the slightest concern for the British sailors - too bad for them, but that's the way it is.


15 posted on 03/24/2007 5:55:58 AM PDT by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

How far off would the supporting frigate sit from the rubber boats?


16 posted on 03/24/2007 5:59:11 AM PDT by steveyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

"15 sailors with small arms on routine inspection duty in two inflatable boats VS patrol boats with mounted weapons?"

Doesn't this represent a significant portion of the British Navy these days?


17 posted on 03/24/2007 6:00:41 AM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Tehran. Third time's the charm:
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
There is no doubt that the cowardly Islamics will respond to the nuking of Tehran with the fastest surrender in history. They have no idea what they're eff'ing with, and Iran needs to be literally glassed over as they are utterly beyond saving. America and the West have a choice: they can be the bulldozer, or they can be Rachel Corrie.

I say fire up the damn bulldozer.
18 posted on 03/24/2007 6:03:06 AM PDT by mkjessup (If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

I don't know the mechanics of it, but I have to believe that every military and refinery target in iran is sitting in the computers that target every gun, missile, bomb, and torpedo within the coalition forces. It seems that this would be a very short war with massive explosive power.


19 posted on 03/24/2007 6:03:33 AM PDT by gotribe ( I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution... - Grover Cleveland.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dog

ping


20 posted on 03/24/2007 6:04:38 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson